Impact of Participatory Critical Pedagogy Interventions on EFL Learners' Class Participation and Engagement: The Case Study of Female EFL Learners in Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Sheikhbahaee University, Isfahan, Iran

2 , University of Isfahan

Abstract

Given the significance of Critical Pedagogy (CP) as a transformative educational practice in empowering and enabling learners in terms of enhancing their voice, this study aimed to examine the effectiveness of participatory critical pedagogy intervention on the development of Iranian female EFL learners in terms of enhancing their voice and class participation. Female learners were selected as the population of the study as gender is a social category reconstructed and negotiated in ELT classroom context entailing the exercise of power. Adopting Hart's (1992) Ladder of Participation framework, this case study was conducted using qualitative strategies fused with the components of experimental design, known as the qualitative experiment design. Accordingly, the in-depth experience of a group of 15 participants during treatment sessions of CP were evaluated through interview, structured non-participant observation, and reflective journals. Findings pointed to the positive and transformative impact of CP in practice on female learners' engagement in and enjoyment of classroom activities in Iran. Moreover, CP in practice resulted in the development of female learners in terms of taking an active role in the process of learning EFL in Iran. However, the development was not statistically significant.

Keywords

References

Abdollahzadeh, H., & Haddad Narafshan, M. (2016). The practicality of critical pedagogy: A case study of Iranian EFL learners’ motivation. Studies in English Language Teaching, 4(2), 196-207.
Atai, M., R. & Moraadi, H. (2016). Critical pedagogy in the context of Iran: Exploring English teachers’ perceptions, Applied Research on English Language, 5(2), 121-144.
Arnstein, S. A. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224.
Burch, G.F., Heller, N.A., Burch, J.J., Freed, R., & Steed, S.A. (2015). Student engagement: Developing a conceptual framework and survey instrument. Journal of Education Business, 9, 224–229.
Cahill, H., & Dadvand, B. (2018). Re-conceptualizing youth participation: A framework to inform action. Children and Youth Services Review, 95, 243–253.
Ebadi, S., Khazaie, S., & Bashiri, S. (2020). Technology acceptance of navid learning management system in the iranian medical English courses under the COVID-19 pandemic. Two Quarterly Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning University of Tabriz, 12(26), 401-433.
Freire, P. (2017). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin Classics.
Frøytlog, J. I. J., & Rasmussen, I. (2020). The distribution and productivity of whole-class dialogues: Exploring the potential of microblogging. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 1-13.
Giroux, H. (1983). Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 55, 257–293.
Goodwin, L. D., & Goodwin, W. L. (1984). Are validity and reliability relevant in qualitative evaluation research? Evaluation & the Health Professions, 7, 413-426.
Gomez, S. P. (2020). Building students' voices through Critical Pedagogy: Braiding paths towards the Other. Colombia Applied Linguistics Journal, 12(2), 55.71.
Gunuc, S., & Kuzu, A. (2015). Student engagement scale: Development, reliability and validity. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 587–610.
Hart, R. (1992). Children's participation from tokenism to citizenship. UNICEF International Child Development Center.
Kahu, E., R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Journal of Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758-773.
Khan, F., Ahmad, M., & Ahmad, N. (2014). The interplay between gender and student classroom participation: A case study of university of Swat. Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), 41-50.
Lissovoy, Noah. (2008). Power, crisis, and education for liberation: Rethinking critical pedagogy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Macrine, S. (2020). Critical pedagogy in uncertain times: Hope and possibilities. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmilan.
Moradian, M. R., Miri, M., & Qassemi, Z. (2015). Dynamic assessment and microgenetic development of EFL teachers' classroom interactional competence. Teaching English Language, 9(2), 1-36.
McLaren, P. (2003). Life in schools: An introduction of critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Nejati, R., Hassani, M. T., & Sahrapour, H. (2014). Engagement, instructional strategies, and classroom management of Iranian EFL teachers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(6), 1219-1226.
Niemi, R. (2019). From active joining to child-led participation: A new approach to examine participation in teaching practice. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 9(1), 223-7674.
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Pearson Education.
Ooiwa-Yoshizawa, A. (2005). Implications of EFL critical pedagogy: Theory, practice and possibility. Keiwa Bulletin 21, 21–29.
Rahimi Domakani, M., Mirzaei, A., & Ranjbar, M. (2012). Appraising Iranian L2 classroom discourse contents from the critical pedagogy perspective. Research in Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 62-80.
Riasati, M., & Mollaei, F. (2012). Critical pedagogy and language learning. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(21), 223 229.
Riasati, M., J., & Mollaei, F. (2012). Critical Pedagogy and Language Learning, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(21), 223-229.
Saleh, S. (2013). Paulo Freire's philosophy on contemporary education. University Bulletin, 15 (1), 91-111.
Sarani, A., Najjarbaghseyah, R., & Vaezi, M., N. (2019). The contribution of gender and teaching experience to Iranian EFL teachers' perceptions of critical pedagogy. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 6(2), 79-101.
Sunderland, J. (1994). Exploring gender: Questions and implications for English language education. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
Sunderland, J. (2000). Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education. Language Teaching, 33(4), 203-223.
Van der Vleuten, M., Jaspers, E., Mass, I., & van der Lippe, T. (2016). Boys' and girls' educational choices in secondary education. The role of gender ideology. Educational Studies, 42(2), 181-200.
Zohrabi, M., & Jafari, H. (2020). The role of think-pair-share interactional activity on improving Iranian EFL learners' willingness-to-communicate. Teaching English Language, 14(1), 153-182.
Teaching English Language
Volume 15, Issue 1
March 2021
Pages 29-49

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 01 September 2020
  • Revise Date: 20 April 2021
  • Accept Date: 08 March 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics