Fixing the Underuse of Code Glosses in Iranian EFL Learners' Academic Writing: A Corpus-based Comparison of Three Pedagogical Approaches

Authors

1 Department of English, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of English, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran

Abstract

In light of the importance of metadiscursive code glosses in establishing writer-reader interactions and the necessity of teaching these markers according to the genre of interest, this study aimed to evaluate the comparative effect of three instructional approaches on fixing the underuse of code glosses in Iranian intermediate English as a foreign language learners' expository essay. Sixty Iranian EFL learners with underuse of code glosses in the Iranian Corpus of Learner English were recruited through a purposive sampling procedure and randomly assigned to four groups: production-oriented approach, genre awareness, data-driven learning, and control. After the treatment phase, three 250-word expository essays were assigned to groups. Four learner corpora were compiled from the learners’ expository essays. Statistical comparisons of the corpora with their counterparts from the pre-treatment phase suggested significant improvements in the frequency of the use of code glosses in the production-oriented approach and data-driven learning groups but not in the genre awareness and control groups. Moreover, learners in the production-oriented approach group outperformed those in the data-driven learning group. Implications of the results, including the potential use of the production-oriented approach in the Iranian EFL context for the instruction of other metadiscourse types, in particular, and academic English instruction at large, have been considered. 

Keywords

References

      149-181.
Ädel, A. (2017). Remember that your reader cannot read your mind: Problem/solution-oriented metadiscourse in teacher feedback on student writing. English for Specific Purposes, 45, 54-68.
Alavinia, P., & Aftabi, J. (2013). A probe into the effect of explicit and implicit instruction of metadiscourse markers on EFL learners’ argumentative writing performance. Teaching English Language, 7(1), 71-96.
Al-Subhi, A. S. (2022). Metadiscourse in online advertising: Exploring linguistic and visual metadiscourse in social media advertisements. Journal of Pragmatics, 187, 24-40.
Anthony, L. (2017). AntFileConverter (Version 2.0.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software  
Anthony, L. (2021). AntConc (Version 4.0.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo,
Asadi, A. (2018). Enhancing writing skills of English learners through metadiscourse resources. MEXTESOL Journal, 42(3), 1-19.
Babaii, E., Atai, M. R., & Mohammadi, V. (2015). Stance in English research articles: Two disciplines of the same science. Teaching English Language, 9(1), 1-27.
Balázs, F. (2020). The production-oriented approach (POA) in Hungary: Piloting POA in the Hungarian higher education context. In Zs. Bocz & R. Besznyák (Eds.), Porta Lingua (pp. 321-329). SZOKOE.
Barabadi, E., Golparvar, S. E., & Arghavan, A. (2021). To put it differently: A cross-disciplinary investigation of reformulation markers in student essays. Discourse Processes, 58(9), 787-803.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.
Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus use in language learning: A meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 67(2), 348-393.
Chen, H. (2020). Instruction of nominalization by applying enabling of POA. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 43(3), 342-358.
Cheng, X., & Steffensen, M. S. (1996). Metadiscourse: A technique for
Cobb, T. (2016). Corpus Builder (Version 2.3). Retrieved from
Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), 95-113.
Dastjerdi, V., & Shirzad, M. (2010). The impact of explicit instruction of metadiscourse markers on EFL learners' writing performance. Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 2(2), 155-174.
Derakhshan, A., & Karimian Shirejini, R. (2020). An investigation of the Iranian EFL learners’ perceptions towards the most common writing problems. SAGE Open, 10(2), 1-10.
Devitt, A., M. J. Reiff & A. Bawarshi (2004). Scenes of writing: Strategies for composing with genres. Longman.
Edusei, J. (2015). Code glosses in student writing: A comparative study of Albanian and German BA theses. In J. Schmied (Ed.), Academic writing for South Eastern Europe: Practical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 119-130). Cuvillier.
Ellis, R. (2017). The production-oriented approach: Moving forward. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 454-458.
Gabrielatos, C. (2005). Corpora and language teaching: Just a fling or wedding bells? Tesl-Ej, 8(4), 1-35.
Gilquin, G., & Granger, S. (2010). How can data-driven learning be used in language teaching? In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 359–370). Routledge.
Gooniband Shooshtari, Z., Jalilifar, A., & Khazaie, S. (2013). Mobile, L2 vocabulary learning, and fighting illiteracy: A case study of Iranian semi-illiterates beyond transition level, 2(2), 65-79
Guziurová, T. (2020). Discourse reflexivity in written academic English as lingua franca: Code glosses in research articles. Discourse and Interaction, 13(2), 36-54.  
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold.
Hinds, J. (1987). Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 141-152). Addison-Wesle.
Hosseini, S., & Mayahi, N. (2015). A contrastive study of code glosses in international and Iranian newspapers. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW), 9(2), 35-52.            
        http://www.lextutor.ca/cgibin/tools/corpbuild/index.pl?uppers=50    
     https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software   
Hui, J. (2009). The contrastive analysis of the use of code glosses in Chinese and English academic discourse. Foreign Language Research, 5, 46-50.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2007). Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 266-285.
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2020). Text-organizing metadiscourse: Tracking changes in rhetorical persuasion. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 21(1), 137-164.
Hyland, K., Wang, W., & Jiang, F. K. (2022). Metadiscourse across languages and genres: An overview. Lingua, 265, 1-8.
       improving student writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 30(2),
Intaraprawat, P., & Steffensen, M. S. (1995). The use of metadiscourse in good and poor ESL essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 253-272.
Jalilifar, A. (2007). Hedging as a pragmatic strategy: Variations across disciplines and cultures. Teaching English Language, 2(1), 43-69.
     Japan: Waseda University. Available from
Johns, A. M. (2008). Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest. Language Teaching, 41(2), 237-252.
Johns, T. (1991a). Should you be persuaded: Two examples of data-driven learning. English Language Research Journal, 4, 1-16.
Johns, T. (1991b). From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. English Language Research Journal, 4, 27-45.
Khazaee, H., Maftoon, P., Birjandi, P., & Rezaie Golandouz, G. (2020). Metadiscourse markers in a corpus of learner language: The case of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language and Translation, 10(3), 17-34.
Qin, W., & Uccelli, P. (2019). Metadiscourse: Variation across communicative contexts. Journal of Pragmatics, 139, 22-39.
Qiu, L. (2020). Enabling in the production-oriented approach: Theoretical principles and classroom implementation.  Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 43(3), 284-304.
Rasti, I. (2011). Involving the reader in the text: Engagement markers in native and non-native student argumentative essays [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Liverpool, UK.
Russell, D. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication 14, 504–554.
Safari, I. (2018). A corpus-based contrastive study of code glosses used in English academic articles written by authors of politics and applied linguistics. International Journal of Linguistics, 10(2), 40-47.
Steffensen, M. S., & Cheng, X. (1996). Metadiscourse and text pragmatics: How students write after learning about metadiscourse. In L. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and language learning (pp. 153-70). University of Illinois.
Sun, L., & Asmawi, A. (2021). A literature review of studies on production-oriented approach (POA) in China. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(6), 74-81.
Sun, S. (2020a). The Production-oriented approach updated: Introduction to the special issue. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 43(3), 259-267.
Sun, S. (2020b). Optimizing teacher-student collaborative assessment in the production-oriented approach: A dialectical research. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 43(3), 305-322.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Talebinejad, M. R., & Ghadyani, F. (2012). A contrastive rhetoric analysis of code glosses in medicine academic research posters written in English by native and Iranian writers. Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation, 1(2), 81-95.
Tham, D. (2013). Expository eureka: Model expository essays for today’s secondary school students. Marshall Cavendish International Asia Pte Ltd.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wen, Q. F. (2007, May 12). Output-driven and problem-driven hypotheses: Reforms on the curriculum and teaching methods for English majors’ programs in a new century [Conference session]. The 1st National Forum of Chairs of English Departments, Shanghai, China.
Wen, Q. F. (2018a). Production-oriented approach in Chinese as a second language. Chinese Teaching in the World, 3, 38-400.
Wen, Q. F. (2018b). The production-oriented approach to teaching university students English in China. Language Teaching, 51(4), 526-540.
Widdowson, H. & Seidlhofer, B. (2018). POA and issues of pedagogic principle. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 41(2), 238-240.
Xiaoguang, C., & Hui, J. (2004). An experimental study of the effect of teaching metadiscourse in the Chinese EFL writing class. Foreign Language World, 5, 68-79.
Zhang, L. (2020). Motivating in the production-oriented approach: From theory to practice. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 43(3), 268-283.
Teaching English Language
Volume 16, Issue 1
January 2022
Pages 167-201

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 24 May 2022
  • Accept Date: 24 May 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics