Teaching English Language

Teaching English Language

Challenges in Writing the Discussion of Results Section in TEFL Theses: Supervisor and Student Perspectives

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of English Language Teaching, Farhangian Teacher Education University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran.
10.22132/tel.2025.492289.1741
Abstract
Globally, the number of second language (L2) students writing a Master’s thesis continues to increase. However, writing thesis genre poses challenges to both L2 students and supervisors. As research documents, in many academic contexts, L2 thesis students struggle writing thesis, in particular, writing discussion of results section (DRS) while their supervisors are not aware of unique difficulties and challenges they face when developing this genre-specific section. Much remains, therefore, to be known about a mutual understanding of the problems between supervisors and students. Drawing on this, the current study adopted a qualitative approach using in-depth interviews with eight TEFL (Teaching English as a Foreign Language) supervisor-student pairs to probe into their understanding of DRS writing requirements and difficulties. Analysis of semi-structured interview data revealed that (1) compared to their supervisors, students had a limited understanding of DRS foci, functions and requirements, (2) shared understanding of the nature and causes of the difficulties and challenges students encounter in DRS writing process was not fully found between the two sides, and (3) despite earlier evidence which identified language proficiency level as a default source for students’ difficulties, insufficient knowledge about DRS genre, i.e., inadequacy of DRS writing literacy, emerged as a crucial source of encountered difficulties and challenges. Implications of the findings are discussed in view of genre-specific intervention programs, emphasizing the need for enhanced DRS writing support, embedded genre-specific writing instruction into coursebooks, and fostered DRS writing literacy.
Keywords

Aitchison, C., Kamler, B., & Lee, A. (2010). Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond. London, UK: Routledge.
Allison, D., Cooley, L., Lewkowicz, J., & Nunan, D. (1998). Dissertation writing in action: The development of a dissertation writing support program for ESL graduate research students. English for Specific Purposes, 17, 199–217.
Bastola, M. N., & Hu, G. (2023). From the other side of the desk: Supervisors’ perceptions of supervisory feedback, Journal of Second Language Writing, 59, 100965,
Belcher, D. (1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 23-34.
Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H., (2006). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. English for Academic Purposes, 5, 4-18.
Braine, G. (1989). Writing in science and technology: An analysis of assignments from ten undergraduate courses. English for Specific Purposes, 8, 3–15.
Brown, A. V. (2009). Students' and teachers' perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. Modern Language Journal, 93, 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00827.x    
Brown, J. (2014). Navigating international academia: Research student narratives. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-6209-704-9
Cai, L. J. (2013). Students’ perceptions of academic writing: A needs analysis of EAP in China. Language Education in Asia, 4(1), 5–22.  https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/13/V4/I1/A2/Cai 
Casanave, C. P. (2002). Writing Games: Multicultural Case Studies of Academic Literacy Practices in Higher Education. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410612366
Casanave, C. P., & Hubbard, P. (1992). The writing assignments and writing problems of doctoral students: Faculty perceptions, pedagogical issues, and needed research. English for Specific Purposes, 11(1), 33-49.
Chen. S., & Nassaji. H. (2015). Politeness strategies in personal statements: A comparative analysis between native and non-native English writers. CASDW 2014 Proceedings, 62-81.
Cheung, Y. L. (2013). Exploring first-year undergraduates’ difficulties in writing the discussion section of a research paper: A Singapore study. The English Teacher, 42(2), 229-248.
Chien S. C., & Li W. Y. (2022). Problems of writing the doctoral dissertation discussion section: Advisors' and their doctoral students’ perspectives from natural and applied sciences and social sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 60(1), 101183.
Chien, S. C., & Li, W. Y. (2024). Perceptions of supervisors and their doctoral students regarding the problems in writing the doctoral dissertation results section. English for Specific Purposes, 76, 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2024.06.003
Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York, NY: Longman.
Cooley, L., & Lewkowicz, J. (1995). The writing needs of graduate students at the University of Hong Kong: A project report. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 18, 121–123. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED390255.pdf
Den Brok, P. (2001). Teaching and student outcomes. Utrecht: W. C. C.
Dong, Y. (1998). Non-native graduate students’ thesis/dissertation writing in science: Self-reports by students and their advisors from two US institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17(4), 369–390.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00054-9
Daller, M. H., & Phelan, D. (2013). Predicting international student study success. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(1), 173-193. https://doi:10.1515/applirev-2013-0008 
Derakhshan, A., & Karimian, R. (2020). An investigation of the Iranian EFL learners’ perceptions towards the most common writing problems. SAGE Open10(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020919523 
Dugartsyrenova, V. A., & Sardegna, V. G. (2022). Enhancing genre instruction on research proposal introductions with an online academic writing tutor. Journal of Second Language Writing, 58, 100908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100908   
Elton, L. (2010). Academic writing and tacit knowledge. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003619979
Fergie, G., Beeke, S., & McKenna, C. (2011). It’s a lonely walk: Supporting postgraduate researchers through writing. Int J Technol Learn High Edu., 23, 236–45.
Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. S. (1998). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process and practice. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flowerdew, J. (2019). The Academic Literacies approach to scholarly writing: a view through the lens of the ESP/Genre approach. Studies in Higher Education, 45(3), 579-591. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1576165   
Geng, Y., & Wharton, S. (2016). Evaluative language in discussion sections of doctoral theses: Similarities and differences between L1 Chinese and L1 English writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 80-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.01.001
Hasrati M., & Street B. (2009). PhD topic arrangement in ‘D’iscourse communities of engineers and social sciences/humanities. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.01.002
Hinkel, E. (2002). Second language writers’ text: Linguistic and rhetorical features. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005
Hyland K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jalilifar, A. R. (2007). Hedging as a Pragmatic Strategy: Variations across Disciplines and Cultures. Teaching English Language, 2(1), 43-69. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2006.113152
Jackson, D. O. (2024). The longitudinal development of argumentative writing in an English for academic purposes course in Japan. System, 126, 103482.
John, A. (1993). Written argumentation for real audiences: Suggestions for teacher research and classroom practices. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 75–90.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3586952
Karunaratne, T. (2018). Blended supervision for thesis projects in higher education: A case study. Electron. J. e-Learning, 16(2), 79–90.
Keck, C. (2014). Copying, paraphrasing, and academic writing development: A reexamination of L1 and L2 summarization practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25, 4-22.
Khodabandeh, F., & Kasir, A. (2019). Analyzing verbs in the discussion section of Master's theses Written by Iranian foreign language learners. Teaching English Language13(2), 23-50. http://doi:10.22132/tel.2019.92187  
Kiany, G. R., & Shayestefar, P. (2011). High school students’ perceptions of EFL teacher control orientations and their English academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 491-508.  https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X522177
Lestari, D. M. (2020). An analysis of the difficulties in writing undergraduate thesis at English education study program of Muhammadiyah university of Bengkulu. Premise: Journal of English Education, 9(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v9i1.2588 
Li, Y., & Flowerdew, J. (2007). Shaping Chinese novice scientists’ manuscripts for publication. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(2),100-117.
Myles, J. (2002). Second language writing and research: The writing process and error analysis in student texts. TESL-EJ, 6(2), 1-20.  https://tesl-ej.org/ej22/a1abs.html
Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
Oj, S., & Siyyari, M. (2024). A comparison of moves in discussion sections of PhD dissertations and MA theses in TEFL and their relevant journal articles. Teaching English Language, 18(1), in press. https://10.22132/TEL.2023.178825 
Paltridge, B. (2002). Thesis and dissertation writing: an examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 125-143.
Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2007). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A
handbook for supervisors. New York, NY: Routledge.
Parry, S. (1998). Disciplinary discourse in doctoral theses. Higher Education, 36, 273–299.
Peng, H. (2018).  Supervisors’ views of the generic difficulties in thesis/dissertation writing of Chinese EFL research students. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 93-103.
Petrić, B., & Castelló, M. (2025). The thesis writing journeys of bachelor’s and Master’s students: A transnational European perspective. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800413993
Puspita, C. (2019, April). Factors affecting students' difficulties in writing thesis: A mixed- method research at eighth semester of English study program in Iain Curup. In English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings, 3, 13- 22.
Quintana, L., & Hermida, J. (2020). A comparative analysis of undergraduate thesis courses in Canadian and Argentine university. International Journal of Research and Review, 7(4)30-37.  https://ssrn.com/abstract=3592112
Rudd, M., & Honkiss, L. (2020). Analyzing the correlation between English proficiency and academic performance among Thai university students. Athens Journal of Education, 7(1), 122-138. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.7-1-6 
Shen, L., Carter, S., & Zhang, L. J. (2019). EL1 and EL2 doctoral students’ experience
in writing the discussion section: A needs analysis, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 40, 74-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.06.004
Shen, L., Zhang, L. J., & Carter, S. (2024).  Understanding doctoral students’ needs for thesis discussion writing and supervisory curriculum development: A sociocultural theory perspective. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 37(4),456-471. http://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2024.2354260
Starfield, S., & Paltridge, B. (2019). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: Context, identity, genre. Journal of Second Language Writing, 43, 1-3.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded theory procedures
and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Tardy, C. M. (2009). Building genre knowledge. Parlor Press: Wes Lafayette, IN, USA.
Tardy, C. M. (2016). Beyond convention: Genre innovation in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.
Tillema, M. (2012). Writing in first and second language: Empirical studies on text quality and writing processes (Doctoral thesis 1), Utrecht University. LOT Publications. Retrieved from: https://research-portal.uu.nl/en/publications/writing-in-first-and-second-language-empirical-studies-on-text-qu
Wenden, A. L. (1999). An introduction to metacognitive knowledge and beliefs in language learning: beyond the basics. System, 27, 435-441.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00043-3
Williams, P. (1999). Results sections of medical research articles: Analysis of rhetorical   categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 347–366.
Woodward-Kron, R. (2004). Discourse communities and writing apprenticeship: an investigation of these concepts in undergraduate Education students’ writing. English for Academic Purposes, 3, 139-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2003.09.001
Zhang, X. (2013). Difficulties English postgraduates encounter in academic writing and attributing factors. (Unpublished MA thesis), Central China, Normal University.
Zhang, T., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Taking stock of a genre-based pedagogy: Sustaining the development of EFL students’ knowledge of the elements in argumentation and writing improvement. Sustainability, 13(21), 11616. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111616 
Volume 19, Issue 2
July 2025
Pages 469-510

  • Receive Date 06 December 2024
  • Revise Date 15 March 2025
  • Accept Date 16 May 2025