Teaching English Language

Teaching English Language

Beyond Memorization: Unpacking Decontextualized, Semi-Contextualized, and Dual-Code Methods in Vocabulary Recall and Retention among EFL Learners

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of English Language, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
2 University Lecturer, Department of English Language and Literature, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran/ Ph.D. in Applied Linguistics, Department of English Language, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
10.22132/tel.2025.481231.1700
Abstract
Mastering vocabulary remains a major challenge for language learners, prompting a continuous exploration of the most effective long-term retention strategies. This study aimed to investigate the efficiency of single- and dual-coding representation of L2 vocabulary items in the recall and retention of concrete words in two successive and distinct phases. In phase one, four distinct groups of female and male Iranian EFL language learners (n=80) received target concrete word instruction within the framework of verbal- (i.e., decontextualized L2-L1 flashcards) and visual-coding channels (i.e., semi-contextualized picture-supported L2 flashcards). In phase two, three distinct groups of participants (n=60) were exposed to verbal-, visual-, and dual-coding (i.e., verbal representations paired with pictures and L1 equivalents) methods for learning target concrete words. Afterwards, Kruskal-Wallis tests and Repeated Measures ANOVA were run to assess the differences in participants’ vocabulary retention across different teaching methods. A comparative analysis of pretest and posttest scores across both phases underscored the importance of integrating verbal coding of L2 vocabulary with visual imagery and dual-coding techniques for effective teaching of concrete word items. Moreover, the findings suggest that an exclusive focus on verbal encoding may impede language learners’ ability to efficiently and progressively expand their L2 lexicon. Ultimately, this multimodal approach promotes deeper cognitive engagement, enhances long-term retention, and highlights potential benefits of gender-responsive teaching strategies.
Keywords

Alahmadi, A., & Foltz, A. (2020). Effects of language skills and strategy use on vocabulary learning through lexical translation and inferencing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research49(6), 975-991.
Aljasir, N. (2025). Vocabulary learning strategies among Saudi EFL learners: a proficiency-level comparison using think-aloud protocols. Cogent Education12(1), 2472480.
Bakhshi, H., & Mohebbati, M. (2024). The Comparative Impacts of Modified Visual and Oral Input on the Vocabulary Retention of Iranian EFL Undergraduate Students. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills)43(1), 121-150.
Banks, B., Gowen, E., Munro, K. J., & Adank, P. (2015). Cognitive predictors of perceptual adaptation to accented speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America137(4), 2015–2024.
Catalan, R. M. J. (2003). Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International journal of applied linguistics13(1), 54-77.
Cheng, J., & Matthews, J. (2018). The relationship between three measures of L2 vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading. Language Testing35(1), 3-25.
Dessalew, A. & Mohammed, N. (2024). The effect of vocabulary learning strategy training on vocabulary knowledge; the case of Addis Ababa University. Teaching English Language18(1), 177-210.
Dorterler, T., & Tavil, Z. M. (2024). The Effect of Mobile Technology on Vocabulary Development of English Language Learners: A Case Study of A2 Adult Learners. Futurity Education4(2), 186-205.
Emirmustafaoğlu, A., & Gökmen, D. U. (2015). The effects of picture vs. translation mediated instruction on L2 vocabulary learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences199, 357-362.
Farías, M., Obilinovic, K., Orrego, R., & Gregersen, T. (2014). Evaluating types and combinations of multimodal presentations in the retention and transfer of concrete vocabulary in EFL learning. Revista signos47(84), 21-39.
Farkhodovna, R. D. (2025). Challenges in learning new vocabularies. Advanced methods of ensuring the quality of education: problems and solutions2(3), 39-41.
Fathi, M., & Sarkhosh, M. (2019). A study of the impact of input modification by using glosses on vocabulary acquisition and retention. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies7(1), 55-67.
Fontecha, A. F. (2010). Gender and motivation in EFL vocabulary production. In Gender perspectives on vocabulary in foreign and second languages (pp. 93-116). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Ghader, H., & Bahlooli Niri, D. M. R. (2016). The effect of pictorial presentation of vocabulary on EFL learners' retention. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances4(2), 101-114.
Ghaedi, R., & Shahrokhi, M. (2016). The impact of visualization and verbalization techniques on vocabulary learning of Iranian high school EFL learners: A gender perspective. Ampersand3, 32-42.
Halpern, D. F. (2013). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. NY: Psychology press.
Hu, W., & Luo, Y. (2024). Chinese English language learners’ vocabulary retention: Investigating the effectiveness of neuro/metacognitive and socio-cultural strategies. BMC psychology12(1), 113.
Ithriyah, S. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Psycholinguistic Strategies on Vocabulary Retention Among English Learners. Zona Education Indonesia2(4), 53-64.
Jared, D., Poh, R. P. Y., & Paivio, A. (2013). L1 and L2 picture naming in Mandarin–English bilinguals: A test of bilingual dual coding theory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition16(2), 383-396.
Jiménez, R. M., & Terrazas, M. (2008). The receptive vocabulary of English foreign language young learners. Journal of English Studies5(6), 173-191.
Joklová, K. (2009). Using pictures in teaching vocabulary (Doctoral dissertation, Masarykova univerzita, Pedagogická fakulta).
Kagan, M. (2018). The Effects of Using Picture-Supported vs. Word-Only Sight Word Flashcards on the Students' Ability to Learn Sight Words. MA thesis, Goucher College.
Kanellopoulou, C., Kermanidis, K. L., & Giannakoulopoulos, A. (2019). The dual-coding and multimedia learning theories: Film subtitles as a vocabulary teaching tool. Education Sciences9(3), 210.
Karatas, N. B., Özemir, O., Lovelett, J. T., Demir, B., Erkol, K., Veríssimo, J., ... & Ullman, M. T. (2025). Improving second language vocabulary learning and retention by leveraging memory enhancement techniques: A multidomain pedagogical approach. Language Teaching Research29(1), 112-149.
Kasmaienezhadfard, S., Pourrajab, M., & Rabbani, M. (2015). Effects of pictures in textbooks on students’ creativity. Multi Disciplinary Edu Global Quest (Quarterly)4(2), 83-96.
Khodashenas, M. R., Farahani, S. K., & Alishahi, Z. (2014). Flash cards versus animated cartoons: A comparative study in vocabulary teaching and learning. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World5(4), 290-298.
Liu, D. (2024). The effects of segmentation on cognitive load, vocabulary learning and retention, and reading comprehension in a multimedia learning environment. BMC psychology12(1), 4.
Llach, M. D. P. A., and Gallego, M. T. (2012). Vocabulary knowledge development and gender differences in a second language. Elia: Estudios de Linguistica Inglesa Aplicada, 12, 45-76.
Lynn, R., Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2005). Sex differences on the WISC-R in New Zealand. Personality and Individual Differences39(1), 103-114.
Maroney, E. E. G. (2024). Training Low-Achiever EFL Learners with Metacognitive Strategy Training for Effective Vocabulary Retention. Journal of Literature and Art Studies14(6), 420-435.
Matthews, J. (2018). Vocabulary for listening: Emerging evidence for high and mid-frequency vocabulary knowledge. System72(1), 23-36.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Multimedia instruction. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 385-399.
Mazoyer, B., Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Mazard, A., Denis, M., & Mellet, E. (2002). Neural bases of image and language interactions. International Journal of Psychology37(4), 204-208.
Nagy, W., and Scott, J. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research. Vol. 3 (pp. 269-284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Namaziandost, E., Razmi, M. H., Atabekova, A., Shoustikova, T., & Kussanova, B. H. (2023). An account of Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ vocabulary retention and recall through spaced and massed distribution instructions. Journal of Education203(2), 275-284.
Nation, I. S., & Webb, S. A. (2011). Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning.
Pahom, O., Farley, A., & Ramonda, K. (2015). Are the best language learners from Mars or from Venus? Gender and vocabulary acquisition in the L2 Spanish classroom. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal15(1), 158-72.
Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and its evolution: A Dual Codingtheoretical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Paivio, A. (2010). Dual coding theory and the mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon5(2), 205-230.
Pishghadam, R., Khodadady, E., & Khoshsabk, N. (2010). The impact of visual and verbal intelligences-based teaching on the vocabulary retention and written production of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. The modern journal of applied linguistics2(5), 379-395.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2007). Things and places: How the mind connects with the world. MIT press.
Rodríguez-Aranda, C., & Jakobsen, M. (2011). Differential contribution of cognitive and psychomotor functions to the age-related slowing of speech production. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society17(5), 807-821.
Sadeghi, K., Khezrlou, S., & Modirkhameneh, S. (2017). Calling Iranian learners of L2 English: Effect of gloss type on lexical retention and reading performance under different learning conditions. Journal of Research in Reading40(1), S66-S86.
Sarani, A. & Ghollasi-Moud, S. (2022). The effect of teaching vocabulary through powerpoint designed vocabulary organizers on different learning styles of preintermediate Iranian EFL learners. Teaching English Language16(1), 311-329.
Schmitt, D., Schmitt, N., & Mann, D. (2011). Mastering the academic word list. Pearson Longman.
Shen, H. H. (2010). Imagery and verbal coding approaches in Chinese vocabulary instruction. Language Teaching Research14(4), 485-499.
Slakk, S. (2024). Improving Reading Comprehension Through Contextualized Vocabulary Instruction. Preparing Adult English Learners to Read for College and the Workplace, 92.
Soh, K. C. (2010). Bilingual dual-coding and code-switching: Implications for the L1 in L2 learning. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 1(2), 271-296.
Teng, M. F. (2023). Effectiveness of captioned videos for incidental vocabulary learning and retention: The role of working memory. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-29.
Uchihara, T., & Saito, K. (2019). Exploring the relationship between productive vocabulary knowledge and second language oral ability. The language learning Journal47(1), 64-75.
Wang-Kildegaard, B., & Ji, F. (2024). Context Synthesis Accelerates Vocabulary Learning Through Reading: The Implication of Distributional Semantic Theory on Second Language Vocabulary Research. Applied Linguistics45(2), 287-307.
Volume 19, Issue 2
July 2025
Pages 255-292

  • Receive Date 30 September 2024
  • Revise Date 19 April 2025
  • Accept Date 21 April 2025