Teaching English Language

Teaching English Language

رابطه بین درک دانشجویان زبان انگلیسی عراقی از اجتماع یادگیری و توجه و مشارکت آنها در کلاس‌های آنلاین

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

چکیده
مدل اجتماع یادگیری (CoI) در برگیرنده سه عنصر حضور شناختی، حضور اجتماعی و حضور یاددهی می باشد که وجود آنها برای ارائه آموزش کارآمد ضروری هستند. در حالی که چگونگی تاثیر عناصر موجود در مدل اجتماعی بر یادگیری و فعالیت دانشجویان و دانش آموزان در آموزش حضوری مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است، در کلاس‌های آنلاین توجه کمتری به آنها شده است. هدف مطالعه حاضر بررسی رابطه بین درک دانشجویان عراقی از وجود اجتماع یادگیری و توجه و مشارکت آنها در کلاس های آنلاین می‌باشد. بدین منظور 311 دانشجوی مقطع کارشناسی رشته زبان انگلیسی عراقی انتخاب شدند. پرسشنامه‌های مربوط به اجتماع حضور، توجه و مشارکت در فعالیت‌های کلاسی در اختیار شرکت‌کنندگان قرار گرفت. نتایج بررسی داده‌ها نشان داد که بین متغیرها رابطه معناداری وجود دارد. نتایج رگرسیون چندگانه نشان داد که حضور اجتماعی بیشترین تاثیر‌گذاری را بروی توجه و مشارکت دانشجویان در کلاس‌های آنلاین دارد. یافته‌های مطالعه حاضر می‌تواند معلمان زبان انگلیسی را در مورد اهمیت وجود عناصر مدل اجتماع حضور آگاه نموده و ایشان را ترغیب به انجام فعالیت‌هایی نماید که میزان وجود این عناصر را در کلاس بالا ببرند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interactive learning environments, 1-13.
Ahmadaliev, D. Q., Chen, X., & Abduvohidov, M. (2018). A web-based instrument to initialize learning style: An interactive questionnaire instrument. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online)13(12), 238.
Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., & Leskovec, J. (2014). Engaging with massive online courses. The 23rd international conference on World wide web (pp. 687-698). Seoul, Republic of Korea. 
Arbaugh, J.B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education 11(3),133- 136.
Armellini, A., & De Stefani, M. (2016). Social presence in the 21st century: An adjustment to the Community of Inquiry framework. British Journal of Educational Technology47(6), 1202-1216.
Asoodar, M., Atai, M. R., Vaezi, S., & Marandi, S. S. (2014). Examining effectiveness of communities of practice in online English for academic purposes (EAP) assessment in virtual classes. Computers & Education70, 291-300.
Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518-29.
Babb, S., Stewart, C., & Johnson, R. (2010). Constructing communication in blended learning environments: Students’ perceptions of good practice in hybrid courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching6(4), 735-753.
Bates, T. (2020, April 7). What should we be doing about online learning when social distancing ends? Online Learning and Distance Education Resources. Retrieved from https://www.tonybates.ca/2020/04/07/ what-should-we-be-doing-about-online-learningwhen-social-distancing-ends/
Ben-Eliyahu, A., Moore, D., Dorph, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). Investigating the multidimensionality of engagement: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement across science activities and contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology53, 87-105.
Bergen, N., & Labonté, R. (2020). “Everything is perfect, and we have no problems”: detecting and limiting social desirability bias in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research30(5), 783-792.
Bliss, C. A., & Lawrence, B. (2009). Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts? A comparison of small group and whole class discussion board activity in online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks13(4), 25-39.
Bolkan, S., & Griffin, D. J. (2018). Catch and hold: Instructional interventions and their differential impact on student interest, attention, and autonomous motivation. Communication Education67(3), 269-286.
Brammer, S. E., & Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2022). Getting the attention of online learners. Communication Education71(2), 155-157.
Burch, G. F., Heller, N. A., Burch, J. J., Freed, R., & Steed, S. A. (2015). Student engagement: Developing a conceptual framework and survey instrument. Journal of Education for Business90(4), 224-229.
Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2020). 20 years of the community of inquiry framework. TechTrends64(4), 557-560.
Cho, M. H., & Tobias, S. (2016). Should instructors require discussion in online courses? Effects of online discussion on community of inquiry, learner time, satisfaction, and achievement. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning17(2), 123-140.
Choo, J., Bakir, N., Scagnoli, N. I., Ju, B., & Tong, X. (2020). Using the Community of Inquiry framework to understand students’ learning experience in online undergraduate business courses. TechTrends64(1), 172-181.
Costley, J., Hughes, C., & Lange, C. (2017). The effects of instructional design on student engagement with video lectures at cyber universities. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research16, 189-207.
Dewey, J. (1933). Dewey, J. (1933). A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process.  D C Heath & Co.
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The Online Student Engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning19(4), n4.
El Refae, G. A., Kaba, A., & Eletter, S. (2021). Distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Satisfaction, opportunities and challenges as perceived by faculty members and students. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(3), 298-317.
Feng, X., Xie, J., & Liu, Y. (2017). Using the community of inquiry framework to scaffold online tutoring. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 162-188.
Fuchs, K. (2022). The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and e-Learning. Frontiers in Education, 7, 921332.
Galikyan, I., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Students' engagement in asynchronous online discussion: The relationship between cognitive presence, learner prominence, and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education43, 100692.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education13(1-2), 5-9.
Gerber, C., Mans-Kemp, N., & Schlechter, A. (2013). Investigating the moderating effect of student engagement on academic performance. Acta Academica45(4), 256-274.
Geri, N., Winer, A., & Zaks, B. (2017). Challenging the six-minute myth of online video lectures: Can interactivity expand the attention span of learners? Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management (OJAKM)5(1), 101-111.
Goggins, S., & Xing, W. (2016). Building models explaining student participation behavior in asynchronous online discussion. Computers & Education94, 241-251.
Guo, J., & Bai, J. (2019). The role of public participation in environmental governance: Empirical evidence from China. Sustainability11(17), 4696.
Hazaymeh, W. A. (2021). EFL students’ perceptions of online distance learning for enhancing English language learning during Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3). 501-518.
Hlas, A. C., Neyers, K., & Molitor, S. (2019). Measuring student attention in the second language classroom. Language Teaching Research23(1), 107-125.
Jackson, C. (2020). Examining Relationships Between Student Perceptions of Community of Inquiry as a Predictor of Cognitive and Behavioral Engagement Mediated by Self-Efficacy.  [Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma University]. https://hdl.handle.net/11244/326689
Johnson, N., Veletsianos, G., & Seaman, J. (2020). US Faculty and Administrators’ Experiences and Approaches in the Early Weeks of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Online Learning, 24(2), 6-21.
Kim, W. (2015). Earning flow, motivation, and community of inquiry in an online graduate degree program. [Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, Indiana].
Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Joksimović, S., Baker, R. S., & Hatala, M. (2015). Penetrating the Black Box of Time-on-task Estimation. The Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. ACM.
Kozan, K., & Richardson, J. C. (2014). Interrelationships between and among social, teaching, and cognitive presence. The Internet and Higher Education21, 68-73.
Kucuk, S., & Richardson, J. (2019). A structural equation model of predictors of online learners' engagement and satisfaction. Online Learning23(2), 196-216.
Law, K. M., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers & Education136, 1-12.
Li, G., Luo, H., Lei, J., Xu, S., & Chen, T. (2022). Effects of first-time experiences and self-regulation on college students’ online learning motivation: Based on a national survey during COVID-19. Education Sciences12 (245),1-19.
Lin, Y., Liu, Z., Luan, H., Sun, M., Rao, S., & Liu, S. (2015). Modeling relation paths for representation learning of knowledge bases. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.00379.
Lodge, J. M., & Harrison, W. J. (2019). Focus: Attention science: The role of attention in learning in the digital age. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine92(1), 21.
Ma, Y., Friel, C., & Xing, W. (2014). Instructional activities in a discussion board forum of an e-learning management system. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 112-116). Springer, Cham.
Morgan, H. (2020). Best practices for implementing remote learning during a pandemic. The clearinghouse: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues, and Ideas93(3), 135-141.
Nejati, R. (2022). The Relationship between Students' Self-Regulated Learning and Reading Comprehension in Iranian Online Classes in the COVID Era. Teaching English Language16(2), 85-109.
Pei, L., & Wu, H. (2019). Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education Online24(1), 1666538.
Pool, J., Reitsma, G. M., & Van den Berg, D. N. (2017). Revised community of inquiry framework: Examining learning presence in a blended mode of delivery. Online Learning 21(3), 153-165.
Preece, A. S., & Bularafa, M. W. (2015). Community of Inquiry' Method and ESL Learners' Speaking skill. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(27), 89-93.
Qays, S., Ketabi, S., Pirnajmuddin, H., & Amirian, Z. (2022). the impact of blended learning on iraqi students' achievement in English literature courses and their attitudes towards it. Teaching English Language, 16(1), 119-139.
Russell, V., & Murphy-Judy, K. (2020). Teaching language online: A guide to designing, developing, and delivering online, blended, and flipped language courses. Routledge.
Schwartzman, R. (2020). Performing pandemic pedagogy. Communication Education69(4), 502-517.
Shea, P. J., Fredericksen, E. E., Pickett, A. M., & Pelz, W. E. (2003). A preliminary investigation of “teaching presence” in the SUNY learning network. In J. Bourne, & J. C. Moore, (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Practice and direction (pp. 279-290). Sloan-C.
Swan, K., & Ice, P. (2010). The community of inquiry framework ten years later: Introduction to the special issue. The Internet and Higher Education13(1-2), 1-4.
Thompson, P., Smith, A. A., & Jeffery, J. O. (2022). Community or Efficiency? The Perceived Importance of Community of Inquiry in Online Community College Courses. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 1-16.
Wang, J., Yang, Y., Li, H., & van Aalst, J. (2021). Continuing to teach in a time of crisis: The Chinese rural educational system’s response and student satisfaction and social and cognitive presence. British Journal of Educational Technology52(4), 1494-1512.
Williams, A. L., & Merten, M. J. (2011). iFamily: Internet and social media technology in the family context. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal40(2), 150-170.
Yudhiantara, R. A. (2022). Applying Community of Inquiry for Language Learning Among English Preservice Teachers. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics3(2), 137-146.
Zhao, H., & Sullivan, K. P. (2017). Teaching presence in computer conferencing learning environments: Effects on interaction, cognition and learning uptake. British Journal of Educational Technology48(2), 538-551.
Zuo, M., Hu, Y., Luo, H., Ouyang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2022). K-12 students’ online learning motivation in China: An integrated model based on community of inquiry and technology acceptance theory. Education and Information Technologies27(4), 4599-4620.
 
دوره 18، شماره 2
خرداد 1403
صفحه 157-183

  • تاریخ دریافت 24 دی 1401