An Investigation into the Impact of Rote and Mnemonic Strategies on Vocabulary Learning of Iranian Elementary EFL Learners


1 Tabriz Islamic Art University

2 University of Tabriz


< p>Vocabulary knowledge is a basis for language education and use as well as for achieving higher order language skills. It is also regarded as the key component of language education. It is believed that knowledge of Vocabulary Learning Strategies (VLSs) can be an effective device for understanding vocabulary. In this quasi-experimental study, the participants were divided into experimental and control groups. The Quick Placement Test was used to select sixty Iranian female students. Two strategy types (rote and mnemonic) were employed in the experimental groups and learners were instructed thirty vocabulary items from Barron''s 1100 Essential Words during three sessions. These strategies were not instructed for the control group. Finally, an immediate and a delayed posttest were conducted. The collected data were analyzed both descriptively and inferentially through ANCOVA. It was found out that the group which used mnemonic strategy, rather than rote-based learning strategy, had a significantly better performance compared to the control group. This study implies that using VLSs can result in a better retention.


Ahmadi Safa. M., & Hamzavi, R. (2013). The effect of mnemonic key word method on vocabulary  learning and long-term retention. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 12(1),          1-15.
Apaydin, D. (2007). Strategies of teaching Turkish as a foreign language. Unpublished M.A.            Thesis;     Ankara: University of Ankara Social Human Science.
Baskın, S., Işcan, A., & Birol, G. (2017). The use of vocabulary learning strategies in teaching Turkish            as a second language. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(9), 126- 134.
Brown, T. S. & Perry. F. L. (1991). A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL vocabulary    acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 25(1), 655-670. 
Cheung, M. (2000). Reading, writing, and rote learning: Drive students at western schools. Business Week.     Retrieved from
Coxhead, A. & Nation, P. (2001). The specialized vocabulary of English for academic purposes. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.). Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 252-267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Du, Y. (2012). The application of mnemonic to improve the middle school student’s English achievement. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 300-310.
Ellis, R. (1995). Modified oral input and the acquisition of word meanings. Applied Linguistics, 16(4), 409-441.
Fasih, P., Izadpanah, S, & Shahnavaz, A. (2018). The effects of mnemonic vocabulary instruction on content vocabulary learning of students. Journal of Language and Education, 1(4), 42- 62.
Ghazal, L. (2007). Learning vocabulary in EFL contexts through vocabulary learning strategies.             Novitas- Royal, 1(2), 84-91.
Gruneberg, M. M., & Pascoe, K. (1996). The effectiveness of the keyword method for receptive and      productive foreign vocabulary learning in the elderly. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 102-109.
Gu, P.Y. (1994). Vocabulary learning strategies of good and poor Chinese EFL learners. The Twenty             Eighth Annual Convention and Exposition, 1(1), 12-16.
Gu, P. Y. (2003). Vocabulary learning in a second language: Person, task, context and strategies.    Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language TESL-EJ, 7(2), 1-25.
Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Khaghaninejad, M.S., Ahmadi, A. & Shegeft, T. (2020). An investigation into the effect of foreign language learning on the use of taboo words in the learners' first language discourse. Teaching English Language, 14(1), 91-117.
Leeke, P., & Shaw, P. (2000). Learners' independent records of vocabulary. System, 28(2), 271-289.
Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: the state of ELT and a way forward. Hove: Language Teaching Publication.
Mahmoudi-Gahroue, Youhanaee, & Nejadansari (2019). Persian learners' acquisition of empty categories in English null operator structures. Teaching English Language, 13(2), 247-268.
Malmir, A., & Aghazamani, Z. (2019). Moodle implementation for L2 vocabulary development and retention: the effects on extroverted vs. introverted Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Teaching English Language, 13(1), 57-84.
Marzban, A., & AzimiAmoli, F. (2012). The effect of mnemonic strategies instruction on the immediate      and delayed information retrieval of vocabulary learning in EFL elementary learners. Social  and Behavioral Sciences, 46(1), 4957-4961.
Mashhadi, A., & Khazaie, S. (2015). Familiar or unfamiliar context? Application of m-games in the blended module of L2 learning. In M. Rahimi (Ed.), Handbook of research on individual differences in computer-assisted language learning (pp. 223-250). Hershey: IGI Publication.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, P. (2003). Materials for teaching vocabulary. In Tomlinson, B. (ed.). Developing materials for language teaching, pp. 394-405. London: Continuum.
Nemati, A. (2010). Enhancing long-term retention by memory vocabulary learning strategies. The  Journal  of Asia TEFL, 7(1), 171-195.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning stra