The Role of Think-Pair-Share Interactional Activity on Improving Iranian EFL Learners' Willingness-To-Communicate

Document Type : Original Article


English Department, Faculty of Persian Language and Literature, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran


Think-pair-share (TPS) is a collaborative teaching activity first proposed by Frank Lyman of the University of Maryland in 1981. It can be used to help learners form individual ideas, discuss, and share with others in small groups. Willingness-to-communicate (WTC) can be defined as "an individual's volitional inclination towards actively engaging in the act ofcommunication in a specific situation, which can vary according to interlocutor(s), topic, and conversational context,among other potential situational variables" (Kang, 2005, p. 291). The adopted design for this study was a mixed-methods one in a small sample size and was conducted in Kish Language Institute. For this purpose, nine upper-intermediate female learners participated in the study. During five sessions, voice recording and a willingness-to-communicate questionnaire were used. It was found out that the number of turn-takings and interruptions fluctuated between groups during sessions, but the main inclination was toward elevation. Furthermore, in terms of the questionnaire, learners' perceptions were more promising in posttest in comparison with the pretest. Finally, the results of the statistical analyses revealed that the willingness-to-communicate of EFL learners in fifth session was significantly higher than their performance in the first session. At the end, some classroom implications are provided.


Adam, B. (2015). Think-pair-share and variations. Central Michigan University: Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching.##
Arnold, R., Burke, B., James, C., Martin, D., & Thomas, B. (1991). Educating for a change.  Toronto: Doris Marshall Institute for Education and Action Between the Line.##
Azmand, M., & Zamanian, M. (2014). Willingness to communicate in L2: Theoretical roots and pedagogical implications. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 2(7), 65-81.##
Bailey, J. (2008). First steps in qualitative data analysis: Transcribing. Family Practice25(2), 127-131.##
Bergil, A. S. (2016). The influence of willingness to communicate on overall speaking skills among EFL learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences232, 177-187.##
Bilmes, J. (1997). Being interrupted. Language in Society26(4), 507-531.##
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System34(4), 480-493.##
Carss, W. D. (2007). The effects of using think-pair-share during guided reading lessons. Doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.##
Davidson, C. (2009). Transcription: Imperatives for qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods8(2), 35-52.##
Dubois, S., Boutin, M., & Sankoff, D. (1996). The quantitative analysis of turntaking in multiparticipant conversations. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics3(1), 20.##
Ebadi, S., & Saeedian, A. (2019). Exploring L2 learning potential through computerized dynamic assessment. Teaching English Language, 13(2), 51-78.##
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.##
Farrokhi, F. Zohrabi, M. & Chehr Azad, M.H. (2018). Corrective feedback and Iranian EFL learners' spoken complexity and accuracy. Teaching English Language, 12(2), 117-143.##
Fathi, J. & Derakhshan, A. (2019). Teacher self-efficacy and emotional regulation as predictors of teaching stress: An investigation of Iranian English language teachers. Teaching English Language, 13(2), 117-143.##
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2009). Active learning: An introduction. ASQ Higher Education Brief2(4), 1-5.##
Klerk, V. D. (1995). Interaction patterns in postā€graduate seminars: Tutor versus student. Language and Education9(4), 249-264.##
Kothiyal, A., Majumdar, R., Murthy, S., & Iyer, S. (2013). Effect of think-pair-share in a large CS1 class: 83% sustained engagement. Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on International computing education research (pp. 137-144).##
Kramsch, C. J. (1985). Classroom interaction and discourse options. Studies in second language acquisition7(2), 169-183.##
Kwok, A. P., & Lau, A. (2015). An exploratory study on using think-pair-share cooperative learning strategy. Journal of Mathematical Sciences2, 22-28.##
Lapadat, J. C. (2000). Problematizing transcription: Purpose, paradigm and quality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology3(3), 203-219.##
Ledlow, S. (2001). Using think-pair-share in the college classroom. Retrieved from Arizona State University, Center for Learning and Teaching Excellence:
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2008). Qualitative data analysis: A compendium of techniques and a framework for selection for school psychology research and beyond. School Psychology Quarterly23(4), 587.##
Loubere, N. (2017). Questioning transcription: The case for the systematic and reflexive interviewing and reporting (SRIR) method. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(2), 15.##
Lyman, F. T. (1981). The responsive classroom discussion: The inclusion of all learners. Mainstreaming Digest, 109, 113.##
MacIntyre, P. D. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports11(2), 135-142.##
MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal91(4), 564-576.##
McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40(1), 16-25.##
McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. The Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association.##
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: Differing cultural perspectives. Southern Journal of Communication56(1), 72-77.##
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (2013). Willingness to communicate (WTC) measurementinstrument database for the social science.Retrieved from
Millis, B. J. (1990). Helping faculty build learning communities through cooperative groups. To Improve The Academy9(1), 43-58.##
Narzoles, D. T. G. (2012). Think-pair-share: Its effect on the academic performance of ESL learners. International Journal of Literature, Linguistics & Interdisciplinary Studies1(3&4).##
Nordquist, Richard. (2018, March 1). Turn-taking in conversation analysis. Retrieved from
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Combs, J. P. (2011). Data analysis in mixed research: A primer. International Journal of Education3(1), 13.##
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L., & Zoran, A. G. (2009). A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods8(3), 1-21.##
Peräkylä, A. (2004). Two traditions of interaction research. British Journal of Social Psychology43(1), 1-20.##
Pöhacker, K. (1998). Turn-taking and gambits in intercultural communication. Master's thesis, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.##
Prahl, K. (2017). Best practices for the think-pair-share active-learning technique. The American Biology Teacher79(1), 3-8.##
Raba, A. A. A. (2017). The influence of think-pair-share (TPS) on improving learners' oral communication skills in EFL classrooms. Creative Education8(1), 12.##
Rack, O., Zahn, C., & Mateescu, M. (2018). Coding and counting. In E. Brauner, M. Boos, & M. Kolbe (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of group interaction analysis (pp. 277-294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.##
Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education17, 74-84.##
Sampsel, A. (2013). Finding the effects of think-pair-share on student confidence and participation. Honors Projects, 28.##
Seedhouse, P. (2004). Conversation analysis methodology. Language Learning54(1), 1-54.##
Siburian, T. A. (2013). Improving student's achievement on writing descriptive text through think pair share. IJLLALW3(3), 30-43.##
Slone, N. C., & Mitchell, N. G. (2014). Technology-based adaptation of think-pair-share utilizing google drive. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 3(1), 102-104.##
Syndicate, U. C. L. E. (2001). Quick placement test. California: University of California.##
Tint, S. S., & Nyunt, E. E. (2015). Collaborative learning with think-pair-share technique. Computer Applications: An International Journal (CAIJ)2(1), 1-11.##
Usman, A. H. (2015). Using the think-pair-share strategy to improve learners' speaking ability at Stain Ternate. Journal of Education and Practice6(10), 37-45.##
Vongsila, V., & Reinders, H. (2016). Making Asian learners talk: Encouraging willingness to communicate. RELC Journal47(3), 331-347.##