Improving EFL Learners' Argumentative Writing Ability: Teacher vs. Peer Scaffolding

Document Type : Original Article


1 Buein Zahra Technical University

2 Imam Khomeini International University


Scaffolding is a temporary entity which enables the novice to achieve his/her potential and then is eliminated when they enhance their learning. Accordingly, this project aimed to investigate the impact of teacher and peer scaffolding on the participants' argumentative writing ability. To this end, one hundred students at Imam Khomeini International University were randomly assigned to four groups: teacher scaffolding, peer scaffolding, teacher and peer scaffolding, and the control group. The treatment lasted for six sessions for each group in three months for the experimental groups. The participants in the control group, however, received no scaffolding treatment. The results of one-way ANOVA conducted on the participants' post-test writings indicated that the total argumentative writing ability of the participants in the three experimental groups significantly improved compared to the control group. The treatment was effective, and the difference between the four groups was statistically significant. The results of the MANOVA also corroborated the ANOVA results. The argumentative writing ability of the participants in terms of the total organization and linguistic accuracy was significantly enhanced through scaffolding, and the difference between the four groups was statistically significant. However, among the three experimental groups, the group receiving teacher scaffolding made the most significant improvement. The results of this study imply that teachers should apply more scaffolding strategies while instructing. The materials developers and syllabus designers should also produce materials which entail more teacher and peer scaffolding in class.


Allwright, D. (2005). From teaching points to learning opportunities and beyond. TESOL Quarterly, 39(6), 9–31.
Altstaedter, L. L. (2009). Writing instruction in foreign language courses: Multiple perspectives on the impact of peer feedback on students' writing proficiency (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Amerian, M., Ahmadian, M., & Mehri, E. (2014). Sociocultural theory in practice: The effect of teacher, class, and peer scaffolding on the writing development of EFL learners.  International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature3(5), 1-12.
Andrews, R. (2010). Argumentation in higher education: Improving practice through theory and Vygotsky, L.S. (1991). Problem asteóricos y metodológicos de la psicología. Madrid: Visor.
Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., & Winters, F. I. (2011). Adaptive content and process scaffolding: A key to facilitating students' self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Psychological Testing and Assessment Modeling53(1), 106-140.
Barnard, R., & Campbell, L. (2005). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of process writing: The scaffolding of learning in a university context. The TESOLANZ Journal, 13, 76-88.
Boblett, N. (2012). Scaffolding: Defining the metaphor. Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 1-16.
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1998). Scaffolding emergent writing in the zone of proximal development. Literacy, Teaching, and Learning3(2), 1-28.
Bruner, J. (1985). Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. In J. V. Wetsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 21–34). London: Cambridge University Press. Chang, C. Y. H. (2015). Teacher modeling on EFL reviewers' audience-aware feedback and affectivity in L2 peer review. Assessing Writing25(7), 2-21.
Bywater, J. P., Chiu, J. L., Hong, J., & Sankaranarayanan, V. (2019). The Teacher Responding Tool: Scaffolding the teacher practice of responding to student ideas in mathematics classrooms. Computers & Education, 139, 16-30.
Choi, I., Land, S. M., & Turgeon, A. J. (2005). Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion. Instructional Science33(5-6), 483-511.
Clark, K. F., & Graves, M. F. (2005). Scaffolding students' comprehension of text. The Reading Teacher, 58(6), 570-580.
Crowhurst, M. (1988). Research review: Patterns of development in writing persuasive/argumentative discourse. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 299 596).
Danli, L. I. (2011). Scaffolding in the second language learning of target forms in peer interaction. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics34(4), 107-126.
Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children's social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38, 207-234.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Introduction: What do you mean by "collaborative learning"? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In Lantolf, J. P., (Ed.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp.33-56). London: Ablex Publishing.
Elborolosy, S. A. M., & Almujali, R. A. (2020). Improving argumentative essay writing of Saudi English Majors through adaptive learning at Shaqra’ university. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 10(3), 161-173.
Ellis, R., (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 193-220.
Farmer, T.W., Lines, M. M., & Hamm, J. V. (2011). Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children's peer experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 247-256.
Fawcett, L. M., & Garton, A. F. (2005). The effect of peer collaboration on children's problem-solving ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 157-169.
Ferretti, R. P., Lewis, W. E., & Andrews-Weckerly, S. (2009). Do goals affect the structure of students' argumentative writing strategies?  Journal of Educational Psychology101(3), 577.
Ge, X. (2001). Scaffolding students' problem-solving processes on an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University, The Graduate School, College of Education.
Ge, X., Chen, C. H., & Davis, K. A. (2005). Scaffolding novice instructional designers' problem-solving processes using question prompts in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2), 219-248.
Howe, C. (2009). Peer groups and children's development (Vol. 14). John Wiley & Sons.
Howe, C. (2013). Scaffolding in context: Peer interaction and abstract learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction2(1), 3-10.
Hunter, J., Anthony, G., & Burghes, D. (2018). Scaffolding teacher practice to develop early algebraic reasoning. In Teaching and Learning Algebraic Thinking with 5-to 12-Year-Olds (pp. 379-401). Springer, Cham.
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing16(3), 148-164.
Jafari, S., Talebnejad, M., & Ketabi, S. (2020). Comparative effects of technology-, motivational-, metacognitive- based scaffolding on male and female Iranian adult learners’ speaking. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 9(2), 259-282.
Kelly, G. J., Bazermann, C., Skukauskaite, A., & Prothero, W. (2002). Rhetorical features of student science writing in introductory university oceanography. Paper presented at the International Conference of Ontological, Epistemological, Linguistics and Pedagogical Considerations of Language and Science Literacy: Empowering Research and Informing Instruction Conference. Dunsmuir Lodge, University of Victoria, pp. 12-15.
Khalili-Sabet, M., Tahriri, A., & Gholami-Pasand, P. (2013). The impact of peer scaffolding through process approach on EFL learners' academic writing fluency. Theory and Practice in Language Studies3(10), 1893-1901.
Klein, P. D., & Kirkpatrick, L. C. (2010). A framework for content area writing: Mediators and moderators. Journal of Writing Research2(1), 1-46.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lai, C. (2015). Modeling teachers' influence on learners' self-directed use of technology for language learning outside the classroom. Computers & Education82, 74-83.
Lajoie, S. P. (2005). Extending the scaffolding metaphor. Instructional Science33(5-6), 541-557.
Lamb, T. (2008). Learner autonomy and teacher autonomy: synthesizing an agenda. In T. Lamb, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and responses (pp. 269-284). Amsterdam, Netherland: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Land, S.M. (2000). Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments.Educational Technology: Research and Development, 48(3), 61-78.
Langer, J. (2011a) Envisioning knowledge: Building literacy in the academic disciplines. New York: Teachers College Press.
Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lawwill, K. S. (1999). Using writing-to-learn strategies: Promoting peer collaboration among high school science teachers (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Lefstein, A., Vedder-Weiss, D., Tabak, I., & Segal, A. (2018). Learner agency in scaffolding: The case of coaching teacher leadership. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 209-222.
Lidz, C. (1991). Practitioner's guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. J. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 47(3), 43-62.
Mahn, H. (1999). Vygotsky's methodological contribution to sociocultural theory. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 341-350.
Massing, C. (2018). Scaffolding immigrant early childhood teacher education students toward the appropriation of pedagogical tools. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 39(2), 73-89.
Meyer, H. (2005). Analyzing argumentative writing. English in Education, 39(3), 78-92.
Mirzaee, A., Domakani, M. R., & Roshani, N. (2010). L2 discourse co-construction within the learner's ZPD. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS)2(1), 91-115.
Mynard, J. (2012). A suggested model for advising in language learning. In J. Mynard & L. Carson (Eds.), Advising in language learning: Dialogue, tools and context (pp. 26-40). Harlow: Pearson Education.
Neff, J., Martinez, F., & Rica, J. P. (2001). A contrastive study of qualification devices in native and non-native argumentative texts in English. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, St. Louis, MO, 24–27, [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED465301].
Neumann, M. M., Hood, M., & Neumann, D. L. (2009). The scaffolding of emergent literacy skills in the home environment: A case study. Early Childhood Education Journal36(4), 313-319.
Newell, G. E., Beach, R., Smith, J., & Van Der Heide, J. (2011). Teaching and learning argumentative   reading and writing: A review of research. Reading Research Quarterly46(3), 273-304.
Nourizhad, S., Hadipourfard, E., & Bavali, M. (2021). The impact of audio-visual feedback on    academic writing task procrastination. Teaching English Language, 15(2), 173-200.
Nunan, D. (2001). Action Research in Language Education. In D. R. Hall and A. Hewings (Eds.), Innovation in English Language Teaching: A Reader (pp. 197-207).
Ohta, A. S. (2000(. Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (pp. 51-78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of research in science teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
Palincsar, A. S. (1986). Metacognitive strategy instruction. Exceptional Children, 53(2), 118-124.
Panselinas, G., & Komis, V. (2009). "Scaffolding" through talk in group work learning. Thinking Skills and Creativity4(2), 86-103.
Papoulia-Tzelepi, P. (2004). Scaffolding the argumentative writing via human rights teaching in the Greek elementary school. L1–Educational Studies in Language and Literature4(2-3), 241-253.
Price, E. A., & Harkins, M. J. (2011). Scaffolding Student Writing. Language and Literacy13(1), 14-30.
Promwinal, P. (2010). The demands of argumentative essay writing: Experiences of Thai tertiary students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wollongong, Australia.
Puntambekar, S. (2009). Key features of scaffolding. Retrieved on 20/11/2013, from http://tcttest-referencematerials. Yola resources/ Scaffolding% 20_%
Reed, K. (2014). The writing process: A scaffolding approach. The Training and Technical Assistance Center at the College of William and Mary Library.
Reid, D. K. (1998). Scaffolding: A broader view. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(4), 386-396.
Rezaei, M., & Shokrpour, N. (2011). Teacher vs. peer scaffolding modes in l2 writing classes: A consideration of genre approach to writing. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 40-64.
Riazi, M., & Rezaii, M. (2011). Teacher-and peer-scaffolding behaviors: Effects on EFL students' writing improvement. In CLESOL 2010: Proceedings of the 12th National Conference for Community Languages and ESOL (pp. 55-63).
Rodriguez-Hernandez, B. A., & Silva-Maceda, G. (2021). Impact of instructional sequence to teach argumentative writing to disadvantaged students using the opinion article. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 103-118.
Roschelle, J. & Teasley, S.D. (1995). Construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Roussey, J. Y., & Gombert, A. (1996). Improving argumentative writing skills: Effect of two types of aids. Argumentation10(2), 283-300.
Salomon, G, Globerson, T, Guterman, E. (1989). The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a reading partner. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 620-627.
Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms, J., & Witte, S. (2013). Writing to learn by learning to write during the school science laboratory: Helping middle and high school students develop argumentative writing skills as they learn core ideas. Science Education97(5), 643-670.
San Martin, M. G. (2018). Scaffolding the learning-to-teach process: A study in an EFL teacher education program in Argentina. Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 20(1), 121-134.
Schwieter, J. W. (2010). Developing second language writing through scaffolding in the ZPD: A magazine project for an authentic audience. Journal of College Teaching and Learning7(10), 31-45.
Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing20(4), 286-305.
Shooshtari, Z. G., & Mir, F. (2014). ZPD, tutor, peer scaffolding: Sociocultural theory in writing strategies application. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences98, 1771-1776.
Shuib, A., Ismail, L., & Abdul Manaf, U.A. (2020). Scaffolding speaking tasks using videoblog portfolio in an ESL classroom. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(1A), 44-52.
Sidek, H. M. (2011). ZPD, scaffolding, and syntax development. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science1(6), 23-34.
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students' reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing14(3), 153-173.
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners' processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition32(02), 303-334.
Tremmel, R. (1990). Going back and paying attention: Solving the problem of the writing process. Journal of Teaching Writing, 9, 71-83.
Turuk, M. C. (2008). The relevance and implications of Vygotsky's sociocultural theory in the second language classroom. Arecls5, 244-262.
Vadipoor, G., Sabani, M. B., & Esfandiari, R. (2021). The implementation of conceptual metaphor as a cognitive solution to English language writing challenges: the effects on writing proficiency and apprehension. Teaching English Language, 15(1), 77-106.
van de Pol, J., Mercer, N., & Volman, M. (2019). Scaffolding Student Understanding in Small-Group Work: Students' Uptake of Teacher Support in Subsequent Small-Group Interaction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(2), 206-239.
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271-296.
Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the Language Curriculum: Awareness, Autonomy and Authenticity. London: Longman.
Veerappan, V. A., Suan, W. H., & Sulaiman, T. (2011). The effect of scaffolding technique in journal writing among the second language learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research2(4), 934-940.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. Reiber & A. Carton (Eds.) and N. Minick, Trans. New York: Plenum Press.
Wang, J., & Sneed, S. (2019). Exploring the Design of Scaffolding Pedagogical Instruction for Elementary Preservice Teacher Education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 1-24.
Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-40
Wells, G. (2007).  Semiotic mediation, dialogue, and the construction of knowledge. Human Development, 50(5), 244-274.
Whipp, J. L. (2003). Scaffolding critical reflection in online discussions helping prospective teachers think deeply about field experiences in urban schools.  Journal of Teacher Education54(4), 321-333.
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing26(3), 445-466.
Xu, Y., Gelfer, J., & Perkins, P. (2005). Using peer tutoring to increase social interactions in early schooling. TESOL Quarterly, 93(1), 3-28.
Yang, W., & Sun, Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education23(1), 31-48.
Volume 15, Issue 2
September 2021
Pages 299-333
  • Receive Date: 29 October 2021
  • Revise Date: 20 November 2021
  • Accept Date: 25 December 2021
  • First Publish Date: 28 December 2021