Basturkman, H. (2009). Back cover blurbs: Puff pieces and windows on cultural values. In K. Hyland & G. Diani (Eds.), Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings (pp. 68-83). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum International.
Cacchiani, S. (2007). From narrative to intensification and hyperbole: Promotional uses of book blurbs. Proceedings of the corpus linguistics conference. Retrieved from http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk
Cheung, M. (2009). Sales promotion as social processes and schematic structures. The Open Applied Linguistic Journal, 2, 32-44.
Christopher, A. A. (2013). Rhetorical strategies in advertising: The rise and fall pattern. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(8), 773-781.
Coffin, C., Curry, M., Goodman, S., Hewings, A., Lillis, T., & Swann, J. (2003). Teaching academic writing: A tool kit for higher education. London: Rutledge.
Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10(1), 39-71.
Cronin, B. & La Barre, K. (2005). Patterns of puffery: An analysis of non-fiction blurbs. Journal of Librarianship and Information Sciences, 37(1), 17–24.
Douglas, K. (2001). Blurbing biographical: Authorship and autobiography. Biography, 24(4), 806-826
El-daly, H. M. (2011). Towards an understanding of the discourse of advertising: Review of research with special reference to the Egyptian media. African Nebula, 3, 25-47.
Gea-Valor, M. L. (2005). Advertising books: A linguistic analysis of blurbs. Ibérica, 10, 41–62.
Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56 (3), 357–367.
Hood, S. (2004). Appraising research: Taking a stance in academic writing. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Technology, Sydney.
Hood, S. (2006). The persuasive power of prosodies: Radiating values in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 37-49.
Hood, S. (2010). Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437-455.
Hyland, K. (2008). Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 1-23.
Hyland, K., & Diani, G. (2009). Introduction: Academic evaluation and review genres. In K. Hyland & G. Diani (Eds.), Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings (pp. 1-14). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Iraji, Z., & Kuhi, D. (2014). Enhancing promotion through generic Features: The case of blurbs in hard versus soft sciences textbooks. Iranian EFL Journal, 10, 206-225.
Jalilifar, A. R., & Banari, R. (2011). Analyzing blurbs: A contrastive genre analysis. In A. R. Jalilifar& E. Abdollahzadeh (Eds.), Academic research genre in an Asian context (pp. 223-244). Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University Press.
Jalilifar, A. R., Hayati, A. M., & Mashhadi, A. (2013). Evaluative strategies in Iranian and international research article introductions: Assessment of academic writing. Journal Research in Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 81-109.
Kathpalia, S. (1997). Cross-cultural variation in professional genres: A comparative study of book blurbs. World Englishes, 16(3), 417-426.
Lemke, J. L. (1998). Resources for attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientations in text semantics. Functions of Language, 5(1), 33-56.
Liu, X. (2013). Evaluation in Chinese university EFL students’ English argumentative writing: An Appraisal study. Electronic Journal of Language Teaching, 10(1), 40-53.
Martin, J. R. (1997). Analyzing genre: Functional parameters. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genres and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 3-39). London: Cassell.
Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142-175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes. 12, 3-22.
Onder, N. (2013). Generic Structure and Promotional elements in best-selling online book blurbs: A cross-cultural study. Iberica, 25, 171-194.
Stotesbury, H. (2003). Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 327-341.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, G., & Yiyun, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 365-382.
Thetela, P. (1997). Evaluated entities and parameters of value in academic research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 101-118.
Vaičenonienė, J. (2006). The language of advertising: Analysis of English and Lithuanian advertising texts. Studies about Languages, 9, 43-55.
White, P. R. R. (2001a). Appraisal outline: An introductory tour through appraisal theory. The Appraisal website. Retrieved from http://grammatics.com/appraisal
White, P. R. R. (2001b). Appraisal: An overview. The Appraisal website. Retrieved from http://grammatics.com/appraisal.
Yang, W. H. (2012). Keynessin academic textbook blurbs: Lexical variations across disciplines. Proceedings of Language and Language Teaching Conference, Pingtung, Taiwan.
)