نحوه بکارگیری ابزار تعامل چندصدایی در بخش بحث پایان نامه های کارشناسی ارشد دانشجویان رشته آموزش زبان انگلیسی در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

چکیده

در این پژوهش، نحوه استفاده دانشجویان رشته آموزش زبان انگلیسی از ابزار تعامل چندصدایی
(Heteroglossic) دربخش بحث پایان نامه هایی که با رتبه خوب وعالی ارزیابی شده اند مورد بررسی و مقایسه قرار گرفته است. تعامل (Engagement) یکی از زیر شاخه های مدل ارزیابی (Appraisal Framework) در زبانشناسی نقش گرای نظام مند SFL) ) است که به بررسی دیدگاه و نظرات نویسندگان و نحوه تعامل و موضع گیری آنها با دیدگاه های جایگزین دیگران در یک زمینه ارتباطی مشترک می پردازد. پیکره نهایی این پژوهش شامل 24 پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد از چهار دانشگاه در ایران بود که بر اساس نمرات دریافتی و ارزیابی مجدد ارزیابان به دو گروه با درجات خوب و عالی تقسیم بندی شدند. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها علاوه بر تحلیل کیفی، از آمار توصیفی و استنباطی استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که ابزار تعاملی چندصدایی توسط نویسندگان این دو گروه از پایان نامه ها به طور یکسان به کار گرفته نشده اند. اگرچه بین استفاده از منابع چندصدایی در پایان نامه ها و درجه ارزیابی آنها همبستگی وجود داشت، نویسندگان پایان نامه های عالی از ابزار بسط بیشتری در مقایسه با پایان نامه های خوب استفاده کردند. تجزیه و تحلیل کیفی نشان داد که نویسندگان پایان نامه های عالی در بیان موضع تالیفی خود با بکارگیری ابزار گفتمانی انقباضی و انبساطی، موفق تر بودند. علاوه بر این، نتایج این تحقیق نشان می‌دهند که استفاده از ابزار تعامل چندصدایی نقش مهمی را در نگارش متون دانشگاهی قابل قبول ایفا می کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


Alia, M.M. & Jomaa, N. (2023). Authorial stance in academic writing by EFL Arab postgraduates. Eurasian Journal of English Language and Literature, 15(1), 96-131.
Babaii, E., Atai, M. R. & Mohammadi, V. (2015). Stance in English research articles: Two disciplines of the same science. TELL, 9(1), 1-27.
Babaii, E., Atai, M.R. & Saidi, M. (2017). Are scientists objective? An investigation of appraisal resources in English popular science articles. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 5(1), 1-19.
Bahmani, M., Chalak, A. & Heidari Tabrizi, H. (2021). A logogenetic delve into attitudinal meanings in native and non-native discussion section of research articles. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 9(37), 65-81.
Biber, D. & Finegan, E. (1989). Styles of stance in English: lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9(1), 93–124.
Coffin, C. (2000). History as discourse: Construal of time, cause and appraisal. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of New South Wales.
Coffin, C. & Hewings, A. (2004). Grammar in the construction of on-line discussion messages. In C. Coffin; A. Hewings, & K. O'Halloran (Eds.), Applying English grammar: Functional and corpus approaches (pp. 91-103). Hodder-Arnold.
Crismore, A. (1989). Appraisal and emotion. In K. R. Scherer, A. Scherer, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion (pp. 141–155). Oxford University Press.
Deng, L. & He, P. (2023). “We may conclude that:” A corpus-based study of stance-taking in conclusion sections of RAs across cultures and disciplines. Front. Psychol. 14: 1175144.
Englander, K. (2006). Revision of scientific manuscripts by nonnative-English-speaking scientists in response to journal editors’ language criticism of the language. Journal of Applied linguistics, 3, 129-161.
Flowerdew, J. (2001). Attitudes of Journal editors to non-native speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 121-150.
Geng, Y. & Wharton, S. (2016). Evaluative language in discussion sections of doctoral theses: Similarities and differences between L1 Chinese and L1 English writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 80-91
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.
Hamdan, N. N. & Ahmad, U. K. (2023). Asserting authorial identity through stance and voice: Expert vs. non-scientific writers. Arab world English Journal, 14(2), 360-377. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no2.25.
Ho, V. L. (2011). Non–native argumentative writing by Vietnamese learners of English: A contrastive study. Unpublished PhD thesis. Washington, DC.
Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 321-337.
Hood, S. (2004). Appraising research: Taking stance in academic writing. Doctoral Philosophy Thesis, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.
Hood, S. (2006). The persuasive power of prosodies: Radiating values in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 37-49.
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (2000). Evaluation in text. Ox­ford University Press.
Hyland, K. (1999). Talking to students: Meta-discourse in introductory course-books. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 3-26.
Hyland, K. (2005a). Representing readers in writing: Student and expert practices. Linguistics and Education, 16, 363-377
Hyland, K. (2005b). Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse studies, 7, 173-194.
Jakaza, E. (2013). Appraisal and evaluation in Zimbabwean discourse and its representation in newspaper articles. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Stellenbosch University.
Jalilifar, A., Hayati, A. M., Mossavinia, S. R. & Jafar, D. (2016). A cross-cultural analysis of English and Arabic blurbs: An investigation into generic structure and appraisal markers. Teaching English Language, 10(2), 1-23.
Jalilifar, A. & Hemmati, A. (2013). Construction of evaluative meanings by Kurdish-speaking learners of English: A Comparison of high- and low-graded argumentative essays. Issues in Language Teaching (ILT), 2(2), 57-84.
Jin, H. (2015). A corpus-based study on engagement in English academic writing. English Teaching, 70(2), 27-54.
Jullian, P. M. (2008). An exploration of strategies to convey evaluation in the “notebook” texts. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. The University of Birmingham.
Lancaster, Z. (2014). Exploring valued patterns of stance in upper-level student writing in the disciplines. Written Communication, 31(4), 27-57.
Lee, S. H. (2006). The use of interpersonal resources in argumentative/persuasive essays by East–Asian ESL and Australian tertiary students. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Sydney.
Liu, X. (2010). An application of appraisal theory to teaching college English reading in China. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1, 133-135.
Liu, X. (2013). Evaluation in Chinese university EFL students’ English argumentative writing: An appraisal study. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 10(1), 40–53.
Liu, X. & Thompson, P. (2009). Attitude in students’ argumentative writing: A contrastive perspective. In L. J. O’Brien & D. S. Giannoni (Eds.), Language Studies Working Papers (Vol. 1), 3–15. University of Reading.
Loghmani, Z., Ghonsooly, B. & Ghazanfari, M. (2020). Engagement in doctoral dissertation discussion sections written by English native speakers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 45, 1-13.
Martin, J. R. (1995). Reading position/positioning readers: Judgement in English. Prospect, 10(2), 27–37.
Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. Continuum.
Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142–75). Oxford University Press.
Martin, J. R. & White, P. R. R. (2005). Language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
Mori, M. (2017). Using the appraisal framework to analyze source use in essays: A case study of engagement and dialogism in two undergraduate students’ writing. Functional Linguistics, 4(11), 1-22.
Mousavi, S. A. (1999). A Dictionary of Language Testing (2nd edition). Rahnama Publications.
Nakamura, A. (2009). Construction of evaluative meanings in the IELTS writing: an inter-subjective and inter-textual perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: University of Wollonong.
Ngongo, M. (2017). Systematic analysis of text appraisal on students’ theses writing in English. Journal of Scientific Research and Studies, 4(4), 67-72 ISSN 2375-8791.
Pascual, M., & Unger, L. (2010). Appraisal in the research genres: An analysis of grant proposals by Argentinean researchers. Revista Signos, 43(3), 261–280.
Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion sections of research articles. System, 30, 479-497.
Robitaille, J. & Connelly, R. (2007). Writer’s Resources: From paragraph to essay. (2nd edition). Thomson Wadsworth.
Ruo-mei, W. (2016). A practical application of appraisal theory on critical reading in college English teaching. US-China Foreign Language, 14(12), 868-876.
Salmani Nodoushan, M. A., & Khakbaz, N. (2011). Theses Discussion Sections: A structural move analysis. International Journal of Language Studies (IJLS), 5(3), 111-132.
Scherer, F M. (1988). Corporate takeovers: The Efficiency arguments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(1), 69-82. 
Sharifi, M., Behnam, B. & Ahangari, S. (2021). Engagement resources used by expert and novice EFL academic writers. Journal of Language and Translation, 11(2), 231-249.
Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R.S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7(3/4), 233-269.
Swales, J.M., & Feak, C.B. (2003). English in today’s research world: A writing guide. The University of Michigan Press.
Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: learning to argue with the reader.   Applied Linguistics, 22, 58-78.
White, P.R.R. (2001). An introductory tour through Appraisal Theory [on line]. www.grammatics.com/Appraisal/Appraisal Outline/Appraisal Outline.doc
White, P.R.R. (2012). Attitudinal meanings, translational commensurability and linguistic relativity. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 65,147-159.
Wu, S. M. & Allison, D. (2003). Exploring appraisal in claims of student writers in argumentative essays. Prospect, 18(3), 71–91.
Wu, S. M. (2007). The use of engagement resources in high– and low–rated undergraduate geography essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(3), 254–271.
Xie, J. (2016). Direct or indirect? Critical or uncritical? Evaluation in Chinese English-major MA theses literature reviews. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 1-15.
Xinghua, L. (2010). An application of Appraisal Theory to teaching college English reading in China. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(2), 133-135.
Xinghua, L., Thompson, P. (2009). Attitude in students’ argumentative writing: A contrastive perspective. Language Studies Working Paper, 1, 3-15.
Zemech, D.E., & Rumisek, L. A. (2005). Academic Writing: From paragraph to essay. Macmillan.