تاثیر گرایش تمرکز تنظیمی بر صحت و روانی فراگیران ایرانیِ سطح متوسطه زبان انگلیسی در عملکرد فعالیت های گفتاری زبان دوم

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه شهرکرد

چکیده

تحقیق حاضر از 2 تئوری انگیزه(به عبارت دیگر تمرکز تنظیمی و تناسب تنظیمی) بهره جست تا به تفاوت میان عملکرد دانشجویان در فعالیت های گفتاری زبان دوم، بالاخص از جنبه ی روانی و صحت کلام، بر اساس ساختار انگیزشی آنها پی‌ببرد. در این راستا، محققین از 52 دانشجوی 1 مرکز آموزش عالی در شهرکرد (ایران) درخواست کردند تا در تحقیقی شرکت کنند که در آن بر طبق ساختار انگیزشیشان به 2 گروه ترویجی-محور و پیشگیری-محور تقسیم شدند. این تحقیق در 2 مرحله انجام گرفت: مرتبه‌ی اول تمامی دانشجویان در یک فعایت گقتاری زبان دوم شرکت کردند که به لحاظ بار موقعیتی خنثی محسوب می‌شد ،و در مرتبه ی دوم، 2 فعالیت گفتاری به گونه‌ای طراحی شده بودند تا یکی از شرایط ترویجی و یا پیشگیری را در ذهن دانشجویان بر می‌انگیخت. یافته­ها هیچ رابطه­ی آماری معناداری را بین متغیرهای مستقل و صحت و روانی گفتار شرکت کنندگان آشکار ننمودند. چنین می­پنداریم که پیشگوئی­های این 2 تئوری بدلیل تداخل عوامل خارجی همچون برنامه­ی آموزشی و تجارب یادگیری شرکت کنندگان محقق نگردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها


Al Khalil, M. K. (2011). Second language motivation: Its relationship to noticing, affect, and production in task-based interaction. [Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University]. Georgetown University Library. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/558134/AlKhalil_georgetown_0076D_11390.pdf?sequence=1
Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Locomotion, assessment, and regulatory fit: Value transfer from “how” to “what.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 525-530.
Azizi, M., & Gholami, J. (2020). Effect of task complexity manipulation in writing on EFL learners’ task motivation. Teaching English Language, 14(1), 341-363.
Boo, Z., Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). L2 motivation research 2005-2014: Understanding a publication surge and a changing landscape. System, 55, 145-157.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216.
Browman, A. S., Destin, M., & Molden, D. C. (2017). Identity-specific motivation: How distinct identities direct self-regulation across distinct situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(6), 835-857.
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing. Longman.
Cesario, J., Higgins, E. T., & Scholer, A. A. (2008). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Basic principles and remaining questions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 444-463.
Chen, G., Farh, J., Campbell-Bush, E. M., Wu, Z., & Wu, X. (2013). Teams as innovative systems: Multilevel motivational antecedents of innovation in R&D teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1018-1027.
Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117-132.
Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). Language learners’ motivational profiles and their motivated learning behavior. Language Learning, 55(4), 613-659.
Dörnyei, Z. (1990). Conceptualizing motivation in foreign-language learning. Language Learning, 40(1), 45-78.
Dörnyei, Z. (2002). The motivational basis of language learning tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 137-158). John Benjamins.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009a). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity, and the L2 self (pp. 9-42). Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009b). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Dörnyei, Z., & Csizér, k. (2012). How to design and analyze surveys in the second language. In A. Mackey & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 74-94). Wiley-Blackwell.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge.
Förster, J., Higgins, E., & Bianco, A.T. (2003). Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 148-164.
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2001). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354-374.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.
Geranpayeh, A. (2003). A review of English quick placement test. Research Notes, 12, 8-10.
Ghafarpour, H., Moinzadeh, A., & Eslamirasekh, A. (2018). I am good at it because I like its teacher: To what extent does teacher behavior motivate students to learn? Teaching English Language, 12(2), 67-87.
Han, Y. (2017). L2 regulatory focus in the context of Korean language learning in Vietnam. [Doctoral dissertation, Concordia University]. Spectrum Research Repository. https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca›
 
Han, Y., & McDonough, K. (2018). Korean L2 speakers’ regulatory focus and oral task performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 56(2), 181-203.
Han, Y., & McDonough, K. (2019). Motivation as individual differences and task conditions from a regulatory focus perspective: their effects on L2 Korean speech performance. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1–12.
Haws, K. L., Dholakia, U. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2010). An assessment of chronic regulatory focus measures. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 967-982.
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.
Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230.
Higgins, E. T. (2002). How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 177-191.
 
Higgins, E. T., Cesario, J., Hagiwara, N., Spiegel, S., & Pittman, T. (2010). Increasing or decreasing interest in activities: The role of regulatory fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 559-572.
Khazaie, S., Torabi, R., & Saghaee, A. (2020). Exploring the viability of augmented reality-based cognitive therapy of low working memory in English for medical purposes comprehension and performance. In th International Conference on Computer Games.
Kormos, J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2004). The interaction of linguistic and motivational variables in second language task performance. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 9(2), 1-19.
Kurman, J., & Hui, C.-M. (2011). Cultural regulatory fit and strategies for coping with unsuccessful outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(4), 482-489.
Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking: Cambridge language assessment. Cambridge University Press.
Markman, A., Maddox, W., & Baldwin, G. C. (2007). Using regulatory focus to explore implicit and explicit processing in concept learning. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14, 132-155.
Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Papi, M (2016). Motivation and learning interface: How regulatory fit affects incidental vocabulary learning and task experience. [Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University]. MSU Libraries Digital Repository. https://d.lib.msu.edu/etd/4037/datastream/OBJ/View/
Papi, M. (2018). Motivation as quality. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(4), 707-730.
Papi, M., & Khajavy, G. H. (2021). Motivational mechanisms underlying second language achievement: A regulatory focus perspective. Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12443
Papi, M., Bondarenko, A. V., Mansouri, S., Feng, L., & Jiang, C. (2019). Rethinking L2 motivation research: The 2 × 2 model of L2 self-guides. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 337-361.
Park, K., & Ryu, G. (2018). The effect of regulatory focus on individuals’ donation behavior. Sustainability, 10(3), 760-772.
Richards, J. C., & Eckstut-Didier, S. (2012). Strategic reading 1. Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3-37). John Benjamins Publishing.
Scholer, A. A., & Higgins, E. T. (2008). Distinguishing levels of approach and avoidance: An analysis using regulatory focus theory. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 489-503). Psychology Press.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2005). Strategic and on-line planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Language learning and language teaching planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 193-216). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. HarperCollins.
Tavakoli, P. (2016). Fluency in monologic and dialogic task performance: Challenges in defining and measuring L2 fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 133-150.
Teimouri, Y. (2017). L2 selves, emotions, and motivated behaviors. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(4), 681-709.
van Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2011). Task type as a moderator of positive/negative feedback effects on motivation and performance: A regulatory focus perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(8), 1084-105.
 
Wallace, C., & Chen, G. (2006). A multilevel integration of personality, climate, self-regulation, and performance. Personnel Psychology, 59, 529-557.
 
Wiener, R. L., & Farnum, K. S. (2013). The psychology of jury decision making in age discrimination claims. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(3), 395-409.
 
Wigglesworth, G. & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity, and accuracy. Language Testing, 26(3), 445-466.
 
You, C. J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2016). Language learning motivation in China: Results of a large-scale stratified survey. Applied Linguistics, 37, 495-519.
 
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pretask planning and online planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1-27.