تحلیل سیاق پیامک‌های دانشجویان پزشکی ایرانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

چکیده

پیامک‌ها همانند دیگر کارکردهای تلفن‌‌های همراه به مشترکان امکان ارسال و دریافت پیام الفبای عددی را همراه با تصویرنگارها فراهم می‌سازد. گفتمان پیامک‌ها توصیف‌گر نوعی تعامل هستند که بین ابعاد دیداری  نوشتاری واقع می‌شود. این پژوهش با کاربرد سه متغیر موضوع سخن، عاملان سخن و شیوه‌ی بیان در مدل نشانه‌شناسی اجتماعی زبان هلیدی در یک پیکره‌ی زبانی مشتمل بر 2440 پیامک گردآوری شده از 122 دانشجوی مشغول به تحصیل در دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جندی شاپور اهواز به بررسی این مضوع می‌پردازد که چگونه گفتمان پیامک‌ها از ابعاد زبانشناسی اجتماعی اثر می‌پذیرد. در این راستا، پیامک‌ها به لحاظ تعامل اجتماعی موجود در بدنه تحلیل و طبقه‌بندی می‌شود. یافته‌ها نشان داد که پیامک‌هایی که از طریق تلفن همراه رد و بدل می‌شود از نوع غیرهمزمان با سیاق خاص خود هستند که دلایل منظورشناسی برای شکل‌گیری این نوع سیاق وجود دارد، چراکه کاربران از هر دو محتوای نوشتاری و گفتاری برای شکل دهی چنین ساقی استفاده می‌کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


Akbari, M. (2013). A preliminary linguistic analysis of Romanized Persian SMS messages. Journal of Novel Applied Sciences, 2(8), 197-205.
Biber, D. (1998). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge:  Cambridge University Press.
Chaka, C. (2015). Textisms, grammatical features, and sentence types in the SMS and IM paragraphs of EFAL learners. Journal of Language Learning31(3), 65-85.
Döring, N. (2002). SMS will be sent, abbreviations and acronyms in the short message service communication. Muttersprache112(2), 97-114.
Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter.
Eggins, S., & Martin, J. (1997). Genres and registers of discourse. In van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as structure and process (pp. 230-256).  London: Sage Publications.
Eldridge, M., & Grinter, R. (2001). Studying text messaging in adolescents. Paper presented to the workshop on mobile communications: Understanding users, adoption and design at the conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI), Seattle, WA. Retrieved from http://cs.colorado.edu/~palen/chi_workshop/papers/EldridgeGrinter.pdf
Firth, J. R. (1935). The technique of semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in linguistics 1934-1951. London: Oxford University Press.
Firth, J. R. (1968). Selected papers of J.R. Firth 1952-1959. London: Longman.
Folarin, B. (1979). Context, register and language varieties: A proposed model for the discussion of varieties of English in Nigeria. In E. Ubahakwe (Ed.), Varieties and Functions of English in Nigeria (pp.77-85). Ibadan: African University Press.
Ghadessy M. (1998). (Ed.). Registers of written English. London: Printer Publishers Limited.
Gooniband Shooshtari, Z., Khazaie, S., & Mehrabi, Kh. (2013). An investigation into the impact of shortened texting on Muslim learners' correspondence ability. RALS, 4(1), 20-45.
Grinter, R. E., & Eldridge, M. A. (2001). y do tngrs luv 2 txt msg?. In ECSCW 2001 (pp. 219-238). Dordrecht: Springer.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hassan, R. (1991). Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hashim, F., Soopar, A. A., & Hamid, B. A. (2017). Linguistic features of Malaysian students' online communicative language in an academic setting: The case of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Akademika87(1).
Hashiomoto, Y. (2002). The spread of cellular phones and their influence on young people in Japan. In S. D. Kim (Ed.), The social and cultural impact/meaning of mobile communication (pp. 101-112). Korea: School of Communication Hallym University.
Hatim, B., & Mason, I. (1990). Discourse and the translator. London: Longman.
Hilliard, J., Kear, K., Donelan, H., & Heaney, C. (2020). Students' experiences of anxiety in an assessed, online, collaborative project. Computers & Education, 143, 103675.
Hughes, R. (1996). English in speech and writing: Investigating language and literature. London: Routledge.
Hussain, M. N. (2013). Language of text messages: A corpus based linguistic analysis of SMS in Pakistan (Doctoral dissertation). International Islamic University Islamabad.
Jalilifar, A. R., & Mashhadi, A. (2013). Current trends in research on mobile phones in language learning. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 110-127.
Kortti, H. (1999). Internet relay chat and the conventions of spoken English. Retrieved from http://student.oulu.fi/~hkortti/proseminar-final.html
Latif, M. Z., Hussain, I., Saeed, R., Qureshi, M. A., & Maqsood, U. (2019). Use of smart phones and social media in medical education: Trends, advantages, challenges and barriers. Acta Informatica Medica27(2), 133.
Ling, R. (2005). The socio-linguistics of SMS: an analysis of SMS use by a random sample of Norwegians. In R. Ling & P. Pedersen (Eds.) Mobile communications: Renegotiation of the social sphere, (pp. 335-349). London: Springer.
López-Rúa, P. (2007). Teaching L2 vocabulary through SMS language: Some didactic guidelines. Elia: Applied English Linguistics Studies, 7, 165-188.
Love, R., Brezina, V., McEnery, T., Hawtin, A., Hardie, A., & Dembry, C. (2019). Functional variation in the Spoken BNC2014 and the potential for register analysis. Register Studies, 1(2), 296-317.
Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (Eds.), The Meaning of meaning (pp. 296-336). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Osisanwo, W. (1997). A linguistic analysis of English medium soccer commentary on radio. Stylistics in Theory and Practice. Ilorin: paragon Books, 70-92.
Partey, F. A., Addo-Danquah, R. G., Bonku, L. K., & Sarfo-Adu, K. (2018). Investigating unconventional abbreviations in SMS texts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(4), 25-32.
Pérez-Sabater, C. (2015). Discovering language variation in WhatsApp text interactions. Semiannual journal of linguistics, philology and translation31(1), 113-126.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the horizon9(5).
Rintel, E. S., & Pittam, J. (1997). Strangers in a strange land interaction management on internet relay chat. Human Communication Research23(4), 507-534.
Rose, D. (2018). Pedagogic register analysis: mapping choices in teaching and learning. Functional Linguistics, 5(1), 3.
Shudong, W., & Higgins, M. (2005, November). Limitations of mobile phone learning. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (pp. 179-181), IEEE Press.
Stockwell, P. (2002). Sociolinguistics. London and New York: Routledge.
Sveningsson, M. (2001). Creating a sense of community: Experiences from a Swedish web chat (Doctoral dissertation). Linköpings University.
Tagg, C., & Asprey, E. (2017). Messaging in the Midlands: Exploring digital literacy repertoires in a superdiverse region. IRiS Working Paper Series16. Retrieved from birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-social-sciences/social-policy/iris/2017/IRiS-WP-16-2017.pdf
Thurlow, C., & Poff, M. (2013). Text messaging. Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, 94.
Yang, N. (2019). The application of register analysis into translation quality assessment. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(12), 1550-1554.
Ylva, H. (2002). Use and adaptation of written language to the conditions of computer-mediated communication. Sweden: Göteborg University.
Yusuf, Y. Q., Natsir, Y., & Yusra, S. R. (2016). (. _.)/dont 4get 2 txt me plz! Linguistic and discoursal features of short message service by female texters. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 22(1).