English Grammar Proficiency Predictability in the Prospect of Present Simple and Present Continuous Tenses: A Case from China

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Jiaying University

Abstract

English proficiency refers to fluency of the language usage. It maintains four skills application, as well as sentence structures, and parts of speech. Morpheme is the smallest unit of a word, whereas verbs and nouns are the first two important parts of speech. They share some forms of words that could make the fluency better. Known as verbs, present simple tense is the foundation of grammar learning, and the continuous tense is the other. In this study, present simple tense and present continuous tense were taken as a tool to predict English grammar proficiency and a predictable exam was developed. As a result, the developed 67-item Tense Test is highly correlated with GPT and has significant differences in predicting English grammar proficiency as a whole. Suggestions are focusing more on the two crucial grammar tenses in English class in practice and introducing more pedagogical teaching materials into classroom on the distinguishments between the two grammar tenses and the others. The implications, limitations, and future research plans are presented in this paper.

Keywords


Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.
Chen, M., & Zhang, L. (2019). Advanced grammatical structures and academic writing: A study of ELLs' writing challenges. Journal of Second Language Writing, 48, 100-112.
Chien, H.W. (2004). The Development of a Computerized Diagnostic Test for Freshman English Tenses [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Tzu Chi University. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/edx27.
Harris, D., & Graham, S. (2021). Contextual cues in language learning: Strategies for ELLs. TESOL Quarterly, 55(2), 435-459.
Jones, L., & Carter, R. (2019). Language transfer and tense acquisition in ELLs. Language Learning Journal, 47(3), 346-365.
Lee, J., & Huang, W. (2021). Verb tense proficiency and its correlation with academic success among ELLs. Applied Linguistics, 42(4), 678-695.
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How Languages Are Learned. Oxford University Press.
Negahi, M., Shooshtari, Z. G. and Vahdat, S. (2022). Exploring the Impact of Unfocused Indirect and Direct Written Feedback on Iranian EFL Students' Implicit and Explicit Knowledge of Grammar. Teaching English Language, 16 (1), 89-117.
Nguyen, H., & Kellogg, D. (2020). Aspectual distinctions in English language teaching: A study on ELLs' comprehension. ELT Journal, 74(1), 56-64.
Niyazi, M. P. and Khoshsima, H. (2022). Depth of Vocabulary, Morphology, and Inference Making as Predictors of EFLs Pragmatic Knowledge. Teaching English Language,16 (2), 139-168.
Pranoto, Y. H. and Levinli, V. F. (2023). Two Tenses for All Sixteen Tenses: A Constructivist Approach. Tarling, 7 (1), 17-36.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman.
Rau, D. V. (1999). Validity and reliability of grammar proficiency test and evaluation of the effectiveness of freshman English composition class. Journal of Humanities, Liberal Arts College of Providence University. 11: 155-184.
Smith, J., & Conti, G. (2021). Overcoming barriers in English tense learning: Pedagogical strategies. English Language Teaching, 14(2), 22-34.
Weir, C. J. (2005). Language Testing and Validation: An Evidence-Based Approach. Palgrave-Macmillan.