<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Teaching English Language 
 and Literature Society of Iran 
 (TELLSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Teaching English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2538-5488</Issn>
				<Volume>6</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>30</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Mainstream ELT curriculum implementation in Iran: A micro analysis perspective</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>23</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">54898</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22132/tel.2012.54898</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mahmood Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Atai</LastName>
<Affiliation>Kharazmi University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Esmat</FirstName>
					<LastName>Babaii</LastName>
<Affiliation>Kharazmi University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Farhad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mazlum</LastName>
<Affiliation>Maragheh University</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2012</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>02</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract> The purpose of this study was to investigate some core issues of ELT curriculum implementation in Iran undertaken by policymakers in practice, i.e. teachers. The core issues include: the efficiency of communication channels between ELT planners and implementers, the extent to which ELT textbooks are believed to meet students’ cognitive and affective needs, the criteria English teachers are evaluated with and by whom, the extent teachers follow officially-approved teaching and testing practices, how ongoing professional support is provided to the teachers, and if context-based feedback of implementers is processed by planners. To collect data, structured interviews were conducted with 22 head teachers and open-ended questionnaires were administered to 672 teachers in 13 provinces. Results indicate that problems pertaining to evaluation policy, methods and techniques policy, in service training policy, and communication policy at practice level widen the gap between ELT planners’ rhetoric and implementers’ practice. It is argued that as long as curriculum implementers are not involved in setting ELT policies, the distance between these two groups will keep on growing.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA"></OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">curriculum implementation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">ELT planning</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">ELT practice</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">planning practice gap</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.teljournal.org/article_54898_826f4329981a0f25d3a12c68aaea72b3.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
