<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Teaching English Language 
 and Literature Society of Iran 
 (TELLSI)</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Teaching English Language</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2538-5488</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Construct Validity of a Language Proficiency Test: a Multitrait Multimethod Approach</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>روایی سازه</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>93</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>110</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">128679</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22132/tel.2009.128679</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abbas Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rezaee</LastName>
<Affiliation>Tehran University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Salehi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Sharif University of Technology</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>02</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract> The present study intends to investigate the construct validity of a test which is used for admission purposes. It was conducted with 3,398 participants. These testees took an English language proficiency test as a partial requirement for entering a PhD program in different fields of education at the University of Tehran. This test has three sections consisting of grammar, vocabulary and reading comprehension. To determine the construct validity of the test, the design of multitrait- multimethod (MTMM) was investigated. According to Cronbach and Meehl (1959), in this design and approach to validation more than one trait and more than one method should be used. In the present study, the two traits used were grammar and vocabulary. The two methods employed were multiple choice and contextualization. The results revealed that the test possessed both convergent and discriminant validities. In other words, the same traits tested through different methods had more correlation than different traits tested through the same methods. To collect more evidence for the validity of the test and determine the effect of the methods used, the researchers also conducted two monotrait multimethod analyses: one was grammar being tested through more than one method and the other was vocabulary being tested in more than one way. The effects of methods were also determined.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">روایی سازه</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Construct validity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">multitrait-multi-method</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">convergent validation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">discriminant validation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">language proficiency test</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.teljournal.org/article_128679_4ebfadcd2da20dfc14f65f93bee1074d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
