Exploring the Patterns of Evaluative Language in Applied Linguistics Blurbs: A Rhetorical Structure Analysis

Document Type: Original Article


1 Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz

2 Shahid University of Chamran


This study explored the patterns of evaluative language in applied linguistics blurbs to see how attitude is reflected in these advertising texts. Following a qualitative approach, the study was informed by pragmatic and discourse-semantic perspectives in exploring the overall structuring of blurbs. Findings indicated that blurbs are frequently charged with appreciation as a category of attitude in the appraisal framework. Graduation as another element in the appraisal framework was also found to be employed both as intensification and quantification. With respect to the communicative settings of blurbs, it was found that blurbs are mainly constructed monologically. Meanwhile, results also showed that blurbs are logogenetically constructed due to the interpersonally prosodic flow of attitudinal resources across the whole components of blurbs. The study concluded that blurbs are logogenetically constructed by means of the monologic pressure of attitudinal resources for increasing the impact of persuasion as the primary tool of advertising discourse in blurbs.


Basturkman, H. (2009). Back cover blurbs: Puff pieces and windows on cultural values. In K. Hyland & G. Diani (Eds.), Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings (pp. 68-83). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum International.

Cacchiani, S. (2007). From narrative to intensification and hyperbole: Promotional uses of book blurbs. Proceedings of the corpus linguistics conference. Retrieved from http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk

Cheung, M. (2009). Sales promotion as social processes and schematic structures. The Open Applied Linguistic Journal, 2, 32-44.

Christopher, A. A. (2013). Rhetorical strategies in advertising: The rise and fall pattern. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(8), 773-781.

Coffin, C., Curry, M., Goodman, S., Hewings, A., Lillis, T., & Swann, J. (2003). Teaching academic writing: A tool kit for higher education. London: Rutledge.

Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10(1), 39-71.

Cronin, B. & La Barre, K. (2005). Patterns of puffery: An analysis of non-fiction blurbs. Journal of Librarianship and Information Sciences, 37(1), 17–24.

Douglas, K. (2001). Blurbing biographical: Authorship and autobiography. Biography, 24(4), 806-826

El-daly, H. M. (2011). Towards an understanding of the discourse of advertising: Review of research with special reference to the Egyptian media. African Nebula, 3, 25-47.

Gea-Valor, M. L. (2005). Advertising books: A linguistic analysis of blurbs. Ibérica, 10, 41–62.

Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56 (3), 357–367.

Hood, S. (2004). Appraising research: Taking a stance in academic writing. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Technology, Sydney.

Hood, S. (2006). The persuasive power of prosodies: Radiating values in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 37-49.

Hood, S. (2010). Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437-455.

Hyland, K. (2008). Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 1-23.

Hyland, K., & Diani, G. (2009). Introduction: Academic evaluation and review genres. In K. Hyland & G. Diani (Eds.), Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings (pp. 1-14). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Iraji, Z., & Kuhi, D. (2014). Enhancing promotion through generic Features: The case of blurbs in hard versus soft sciences textbooks. Iranian EFL Journal, 10, 206-225.

Jalilifar, A. R., & Banari, R. (2011). Analyzing blurbs: A contrastive genre analysis. In A. R. Jalilifar& E. Abdollahzadeh (Eds.), Academic research genre in an Asian context (pp. 223-244). Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University Press.

Jalilifar, A. R., Hayati, A. M., & Mashhadi, A. (2013). Evaluative strategies in Iranian and international research article introductions: Assessment of academic writing. Journal Research in Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 81-109.

Kathpalia, S. (1997). Cross-cultural variation in professional genres: A comparative study of book blurbs. World Englishes, 16(3), 417-426.

Lemke, J. L. (1998). Resources for attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientations in text semantics. Functions of Language, 5(1), 33-56.

Liu, X. (2013). Evaluation in Chinese university EFL students’ English argumentative writing: An Appraisal study. Electronic Journal of Language Teaching, 10(1), 40-53.

Martin, J. R. (1997). Analyzing genre: Functional parameters. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genres and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 3-39). London: Cassell.

Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142-175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes. 12, 3-22.

Onder, N. (2013). Generic Structure and Promotional elements in best-selling online book blurbs: A cross-cultural study. Iberica, 25, 171-194.

Stotesbury, H. (2003). Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 327-341.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, G., & Yiyun, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12(4), 365-382.

Thetela, P. (1997). Evaluated entities and parameters of value in academic research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 101-118.

Vaičenonienė, J. (2006). The language of advertising: Analysis of English and Lithuanian advertising texts. Studies about Languages, 9, 43-55.

White, P. R. R. (2001a). Appraisal outline: An introductory tour through appraisal theory. The Appraisal website. Retrieved from http://grammatics.com/appraisal

White, P. R. R. (2001b). Appraisal: An overview. The Appraisal website. Retrieved from http://grammatics.com/appraisal.

Yang, W. H. (2012). Keynessin academic textbook blurbs: Lexical variations across disciplines. Proceedings of Language and Language Teaching Conference, Pingtung, Taiwan.