The Reciprocal Questioning as a Formative Assessment Strategy: EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary Learning

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

2 Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Implementing the mere product-oriented assessment techniques in public schools has exposed the Iranian EFL learners to interminable problems in reading comprehension and the use of the learnt vocabulary in written and spoken communication and language use. This study assessed reading comprehension and vocabulary knowledge by practicing the reciprocal questioning (RQ) as an interactive and ongoing assessment strategy. Forty-eight male intermediate participants were recruited from a population of 60 high school students based on their scores on a Cambridge Preliminary English Test (PET). The study employed two intact classes from which the experimental group with 24 participants was assessed using the RQ, while the control group got summative assessment (SA). These two randomly assigned groups were studied for eight weeks. Then, the obtained pretest and posttest scores were analyzed and compared utilizing the Independent Samples T-test and the one-way ANCOVA. The results underscored the effective and contributive role of the RQ, as the process-oriented assessment, on reading comprehension and vocabulary learning of the learners. In general, the result of this study may be illuminative to the rapidly growing SLA research in practicing different formative assessment strategies. In particular, the findings may be pedagogically advantageous to learners, practitioners and theoreticians in SLA.

Keywords

References

Abdul Baqi, F. (2019). Implementing question-answer relationships (QAR) strategy to improve students’ reading comprehension skill. English Journal, 13(2), 88-98.
Ahmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N., & Kabilan, M. K. (2012). Improving vocabulary learning in foreign language learning through reciprocal teaching strategy. International Journal of Learning and Development, 2(6), 186-201.
Alderson, J. C.  (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency. New York: Continuum.
Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(3), 21-34.
Alsaraireh, M. Y. A. (2016). The effect of the reciprocal teaching model on developing Jordanian students' reading comprehension at Mutah university.  International Journal of Linguistics, 8(6), 69-93.
Ashegh Navaie, L. (2018). The effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(4), 26-30.
Assessment Reform Group (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Research-based principles to guide classroom practice. Retrieved from https://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/DocLibrary/SBA/HKDSE/Eng_DVD /doc/Afl_principles.pdf
Ayun, Q., & Yunus, M. (2017). The efficacy of reciprocal teaching method in teaching reading comprehension to EFL students. ELT-Echo, 2(2), 134-146.
Beck, J. S., & Nunnaley, D. (2020). A continuum of data literacy for teaching. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-75.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational    Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551-575.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Brigid Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140.
Deegan, J. (2007). Request (Reciprocal Questioning Technique). Retrieved from http://files5.pdesas.org/01503 1076037216025250025015207124008072208111229/Download.ashx?hash=2.2
Diehl, H. L. (2005). The effects of the reciprocal teaching framework on strategy acquisition of fourth-grade struggling readers (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/ 8826910ce371fa20991db487940b9de9/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ernaini, E., Nurweni, A., & Suparman, U. (2018).  Question answer relationship (QAR) in teaching reading comprehension at SMPN5 Bandar Lampung. UNILA- Journal of English Teaching (U-JET), 7(2), 1-8.
Ersianawati, N. L., Santosa, M. H., & Suprianti, G. A. P. (2018). Incorporating reciprocal questioning strategy and numbered heads together in reading class. International Journal of Language and Literature, 2(1), 19-29.
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2015). Checking for understanding: Formative assessment techniques for your classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Freihat, S., & Almakhzoomi, K. (2012). The effects of reciprocal teaching procedure on enhancing EFL students reading comprehension behavior in a university setting. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(5), 279-291.
Garrison, C., & Ehringhaus, M. (2007). Formative and summative assessments in the classroom. Retrieved from http://www.amle.org/Publications/WebExclusive/Assessment/tabid/1120/Default.aspx
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning.  Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 3–31.
Goodman, J. (2011). Improving progress through assessment for learning. Headteacher Update, 2011(12).
Grabe, W. (2009). Teaching and testing reading. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 441-462). MA: Blackwell Publishing LTD.
Haffie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
Harderbeck, M. M. (2006). Effectiveness and usage of reading comprehension strategies for second grade title 1 students (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/d0e3cf3afc3effd93ae179 b137dc726f/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Ismail, H. N., Ahmadi, M. R., & Pourhossein Gilakjani, A. P. (2012). The role of reciprocal teaching strategy as an important factor of improving reading motivation. Elixir International Journal, 53, 11836-11841. Retrieved from www.elixirpubli shers.com
Khazaie, S., Torabi, R., & Saghaee, A. (2020). Exploring the viability of augmented reality-based cognitive therapy of low working memory in English for medical purposes comprehension and performance. In th International Conference on Computer Games.
Khoiriah, N., Suparman, U., & Nainggolan, F. (2017). Improving students reading comprehension ability through P-Q-R-S-T strategy at SMKI Assyaroniyyah. UNILA Journal of English Teaching, 6(6), 1-9.
Kim, D. (2020). Learning language, learning culture: Teaching language to the whole student. ECNU Review of Education, 3(3), 519-541.
Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon. 
Lewis, E. R. (2016). Reciprocal teaching as a reading-comprehension strategy among first-year Industrial technology teacher-education majors at the University of Technology, Jamaica (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5abc/8d9b990e3887b3983e621d3f376e32510080. pdf
Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (2013). Assessment and instruction of reading and writing difficulties: An interactive approach. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Malia, N. (2015). Using PQRST strategy to improve students’ reading comprehension of hortatory exposition texts at grade XI IPS of MA Diniyah Puteri, Pekanbaru. English Language Teaching, 1(1), 1-7.
Malmir, A., & Aghazamani, Z. (2019). Moodle implementation for L2 vocabulary development and retention: The effects on extroverted vs. introverted Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Teaching English Language, 13(1), 57- 84.
McDowell, L. (2006). The impact of innovative assessment on student learning. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32(4), 302-313.
McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., & Ronette, B. G. K. (2009). Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3), 218-253. doi:10.1598/RRQ.44.3.1
McManus, S. (2006). Attributes of effective formative assessment. The Council of Chief State School Officers: Washington, DC.
Meyer, K. (2010). Diving into reading: Revisiting reciprocal teaching in the middle years. Literacy Learning, 18(1), 41-52.
Miqawati, A. H., & Sulistyo, G. H. (2014). The PQRST strategy, reading comprehension, and learning styles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 123-139.
Mousavi, S., & Ketabi, S. (2021). Impact of participatory critical pedagogy interventions on EFL learners’ class participation and engagement: The case study of female EFL learners in Iran. Teaching English Language (TEL), 15(1). 29-49.
Oczkus, L. D. (2018). Reciprocal teaching at work: Powerful strategies and lessons for improving reading comprehension (3nd ed.). ASCD and International Literacy Association, Alexandria, USA.
Oddo, M., Barnett, D., Hawkins, R. O., & Musti-Rao, S. (2010). Reciprocal peer tutoring and repeated reading: Increasing practicality using student groups. Psychology in the Schools, 47(8), 842-858.
Okkinga, M.,   Steensel, R. V., Van Gelderen, A. J. S., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2016). Effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension of low-achieving adolescents. The importance of specific teacher skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(1), 20-41.  
Ortlieb, E., & Norris, M. (2012). Using the think-aloud strategy to bolster reading comprehension of science concepts. Current Issues in Education, 15(1), 1-10.
Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
Rahimi, M., & Sadeghi, N. (2015). Impact of reciprocal teaching on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 64-86.
Rufinus, Y. A., & Wijaya, B. (2014). The use of reciprocal questioning (request) strategy in teaching reading comprehension. Retrieved from 214960-the-use-of-reciprocal-questioning-reques.pdf
Shermis, M. D., & Di Vesta, F. J. (2011). Classroom assessment in action. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Soleimani, H., & Hajghani, S. (2013). The effect of teaching reading comprehension strategies on Iranian EFL pre-university students' reading comprehension ability. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 5(5), 594-600.
Soodmand Afshar, H., & Ranjbar, N. (2021). EAP teachers’ assessment literacy: From theory to practice. Studies in Educational Evaluation,70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101042
Spörer, N., Brunstein, J., & Kieschke, U. (2009). Improving students’ reading comprehension skills: Effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching. Learning & Instruction, 19(3), 272-286.
Susanti, A. N. R. (2013). Improving students’ reading comprehension through PQRST technique at grade XI of SMA PIRI 1 Yogyakarta (Doctoral dissertation).  Retrieved from http://eprints.uny.ac.id/25726/1/Aprida %20Nur%20Riya%20Susanti%2009202241085.pdf
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371-391.
Tavassoli, K., & Farhady, H. (2018). Assessment knowledge needs of EFL teachers. Teaching English Language, 12(2), 45-65.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. R. (2013). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Warman, L. A. D. (2016). Improving students' reading comprehension through the use of reciprocal teaching technique at STMIK Riau Pekanbaru. Journal of English Education, 2(1), 1-8.
Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3-14.
Zare, M., Barjesteh, H., & Biria, R. (2021). Enhancing EFL learners' reading comprehension skill through critical thinking-oriented dynamic assessment. Teaching English Language, 15(1), 189-214. https://doi.org/10.22132/TEL.2021.133238
Zohrabi, M., & Jafari, H. (2020). The role of think-pair-share interactional activity on improving Iranian EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Teaching English Language, 14(1), 152-182.
Teaching English Language
Volume 15, Issue 2
September 2021
Pages 61-93

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 08 July 2021
  • Revise Date: 01 October 2021
  • Accept Date: 05 November 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics