Developments of English Language Speaking Skill, Awareness and Metacognitive Strategy Use in the Light of Dynamic Assessment Models


1 Department of Foreign Languages, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 4th Floor, No 20, Marjan Al., East Fatemi St., Tehran, IRAN

3 TEFL Department, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran


Since its introduction to education, Dynamic Assessment (DA) has gained attention from the researchers in different educational fields. However, the two models of DA (interventionist and interactionist) have rarely been incorporated comparatively into skill, style, and strategy developments in an EFL setting. This study synthesized the development of the speaking skill, level of language awareness (LA), and metacognitive strategy use (MSU) in the light of comparative incorporation of DA models to fill this gap. Sixty undergraduate Iranian EFL students majoring in English Translation Studies attended this mixed methods research. Quantitative analysis of the data showed that although the participants in both groups were able to gain significantly higher speaking scores as compared to their counterparts in the control group inter-experimental groups’ differences were not significant. Regarding LA and MSU, neither the interventionist nor the interactionist model led to significant levels in the process of developing the speaking skill. The qualitative analysis of interviews, however, showed specific changes in the experimental groups' LA and MSU in light of the DA-oriented mediation. In addition to theoretical contributions, the results shed light on some aspects of integrating DA in EFL education and bear some implications for multiple EFL stakeholders.


Abbasian, Gh. R. (2005). Iranian EFL learners' metacognitive strategy use (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Campus, Tehran, Iran.    
Ableeva, R. (2010). Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in second language learning (Unpublished dictoral dissertation). Pennsylvania, USA: The Pennsylvania State University.
Aghaebrahimian, A., Rahimirad, M., AhmadiA., & Khalilpour Alamdari, J. (2014). Dynamic assessment of writing skill in advanced EFL Iranian learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 60-67.
Ahmadi Safa, M., & Beheshti, S. (2018). Interactionist and interventionist group dynamic assessment (GDA) and EFL learners' listening comprehension development. Iranian Journal of Language tecahing Research, 6(3), 37-56.
Ahmadi Safa, M., Donyaie, S., & Malek Mohammadi, R. (2015). An investigation into the effect of interactionist versus interventionist models of dynamic assessment on Iranian EFL learners' speaking skill proficiency. Teaching English Language, 9, 147-166.
Ahmadi, A., & Barabadi, A. (2014). Examining Iranian EFL learners' knowledge of grammar through a computerized dynamic test. Issues in Language Teaching, 3(2), 183-161.
Alemi, M. (2015). The impact of dynamic assessment on Iranian EFL students' writing self-assessment. Teaching English Language, 9(1), 145-169.
Anton, M. (2003). Dynamic assessment of advanced foreign language learners. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics. Washington, D.C.
Anton, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced. Foreign Language Annals, 42, 576-598.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publisher.
Barabadi, E., Khajavy, G. H., & Kamrood, A. M. (2018). Applying interventionist and interactionist approaches to dynamic Assessment for L2 listening comprehension. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 681-700.
Barzegar, R., & Azarizad, R. (2013). Using dynamic assessment to improve L2 learners' knowledge of grammar: Evidence from the tenses. Classroom-oriented Research, 219-227.
Birjandi, P., Estaji, M., & Deyhim, T. (2013). The impact of dynamic assessment on reading comprehension and metacognitive awareness of reading strategy use in Iranian high school learners . Iranian Journal of Language Testing, 60-77.
Brook-Hart, G., & Jakeman, V. (2012). Complete IELTS bands 5-6.5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carter, R. (2003). Language Awareness. ELT Journal, 57(1), 64-65.
Correia, R. C. (2016). Assessing speaking proficiency: A challenge for the Portuguese EFL teacher. e-TEALS, 7(1), 87-107.
Daneshfar, S., Aliasin, S. H., & Hashemi, A. (2018). The effect of dynamic assessment on Grammar achievement of Iranian third grade secondary school EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 295-305.
Ebadi, S., & Asakareh, A. (2017). Developing EFL learners' speaking skills through dynamic assessment: A case of a beginner and an advanced learner. Cognet Education, 4(1), 1-18.
Estaji, M., & Ameri, A. F. (2020). Dynamic assessment and its impact on pre-intermediate and high-intermediate EFL learners' grammar achievement. Cogent Education7(1), 1740040.
Fairclough, N. (1999). Global capitalism and critical awareness of language. Language Awareness, 8(2), 71-83.
Fani, T., & Rashtchi, M. (2015). Examining the impact of concurrent and cumulative group dynamic assessment on reading comprehension ability of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Review in Life Sciences, 5(6), 798-804.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: the leraning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Maltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE.
Fracasso, L. E., Bangs, K., & Binder, K. S. (2016). The contributions of phonological and morphological awareness to literacy skills in the adult basic education population. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49 (2), 140-151.
Fulcher, G. &. (2003). Task difficulty in speaking tests. Language Testing, 20(3), 321-344.
Hatch, E. M., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. New York, NY: Newbury House Publishers.
Heaton, J. (2006). Writing English language tests. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 2(2), 119-122.
Khoshsima, H., & Farokhipour, S. (2016). On the role of different models of dynamic assessment on promoting speaking. International journal of humanities and cultural studies, 586-600.
Köroglu, Z. Ç. (2019). Interventionist dynamic assessment's effects on speaking skills testing: Case of ELT teacher candidates. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(3), 23-31.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment: bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 49-74.
Lantolf, J., & Pehner, M. E. (2013). The unfairness of equal treatment: Objectivity in L2 testing and dynamic assessment. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(2-3), 141-157.
Lantolf, J., & Poehner, M. (2007). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice,, 1(1), 49-72.
Lantolf, J., & Poehner, M. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11-33.
Malmeer, E., & Zoghi, M. (2014). Dynamic assessment of grammar with different age groups. Theory and Practice in Lnaguage Studies, 4(8), 1707-1714.
Navarro, J.J. &Lara, L. (2017). Dynamic assessment of reading difficulties: predictive and incremental validity on attitude toward reading and the use of dialogue/participation strategies in classroom activities. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(173), 1-14.
Pishghadam, R., Barabadi, E., & Mehri Kamrood, A. (2011). The differing effect of computerized dynamic assessment of L2 reading comprehension on high and low achievers. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 2(6).
Poehner, M. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. The Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 323-340.
Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment a Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 developement. University Park, PA: Springer.
Poehner, M., & Lantolf, J. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 1-33.
Purpura, J. E. (1997). An analysis of the relationships between test takers' cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language test performance. Language Learning, 47(2), 289-325.
Rashidi, N. &. (2018). An investigation into the effect of dynamic assessment on the EFL learners’ process writing development. SAGE Open, 8(2), 1-14.
Siwathaworn, P., & Wudthayagorn, J. (2018). The impact of dynamic assessment on tertiary EFL students' speaking. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5, 142-155.
Son, G., & Kim, S. (2017). The potentials of dynamic assessment for the development of English speaking performance: A microgenetic analysis. Retrieved from laf?barcode=4010025100380
Sternberg, R., & Grigorenko, E. (2002). Dynamic testing. The nature and measurements of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tajeddin, Z., & Tayebipour, F. (2012). The effect of dynamic assessment on EFL learners' acquisition of request and apology. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 31(2), 87-118.
Thouësny, S. (2010). Assessing second language learners' written texts: An interventionist andinteractionist approaches to dynamic assessment. proceeding of the world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunication. Toronto, Canada: (EDMEDIA).
Verity, D. (2003). Everyone is a native speaker: Promoting language awareness in classroom. NUCB JLCC, 5(2), 133-141.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wahyurianto, I. (2018). Using group discussion to improve students' speaking fluency. Journal of English for Academic and Specific Purposes, 1(1),13–21.
Weisgerber, J. (2015). Bridging the gap between instruction and assessment: examining the role of dynamic assessment in the oral proficiency skills of English-as-an-additional-language learners. The Arbutus Review, 6(1), 25-40.
Zhang, L., & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement: Insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching , 54-69.
Volume 14, Issue 2
September 2020
Pages 145-172
  • Receive Date: 29 March 2020
  • Revise Date: 07 November 2020
  • Accept Date: 05 December 2020
  • First Publish Date: 07 December 2020