Developing a Learner Autonomy Questionnaire in English as a Foreign Language Reading Comprehension

Document Type : Original Article


1 Faculty of Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

2 Department of English, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran


There is not a widespread agreement on the operational definition of the construct of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) autonomy in reading comprehension (RC) because there is not an established tool to quantitatively describe its proportion. Therefore, the current investigation intends to design a learner autonomy questionnaire in reading comprehension and undertake its validation; the proposed items are context-specific. In this study, consultation with the relevant literature and the views of EFL experts provided the researchers with invaluable insights to construct a five-component-model for the definition of autonomy in EFL RC. Both exploratory and confirmatory data analysis procedures were utilized to check the validity and reliability of the contextualized items in the proposed model. The findings put forth new insights for the practitioners, curriculum developers, and EFL teachers to make students autonomous in reading comprehension skills. The results are also promising in motivating the at-risk students to actively develop reading comprehension skills in the reading classes.


Akbari, R., Behzadpoor, F., &Dadvand, B. (2009).Development of English language teaching reflection inventory. System, 38(2), 211–227.##
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Essex: Pearson Education.##
Brown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.##
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.##
Ceylan, N. O. (2015). Fostering learner autonomy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 85-93.##
Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in Language Learning Strategy Research and Teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1.##
Coffman, T., & Klinger, M. B. (2007).Utilizing virtual worlds in education: The implications for practice. International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 29-33.##
Dornyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.##
Fatehi Rad, N. (2011). The role of reading strategies awareness on reading comprehension performance of advanced Iranian EFL learners. ELT Voices, 1(4), 27-30.##
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906.##
Flicks, U. (1998).An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.##
Ghalandari, S., &Talebinejad, M. R. (2012).Medical ESP textbook evaluation in Shiraz medical college. Education Research Journal, 2(1), 20-29.##
Ghazanfari, M. (2009).The role of visualization in EFL learners' reading comprehension and recall of short stories. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies 1, 25-37.##
Gholami, A. G. M., Ahghar, M. R., & Ahghar, M. (2012).The effect of teaching cognitive and metacognitive strategies on EFL students’ reading comprehension across proficiency levels. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3757-3763.##
Glenberg, J. M. C. (2005). Web-based training of metacognitive strategies for text comprehension: Focus on poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18(7-9), 755-786.##
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.##
Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995).The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.##
Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children's metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 255-278.##
Joshi, K R. (2011). Learner perceptions and teacher beliefs about learner autonomy in language learning. Journal of NELTA (Nepal English Language Learning Association), 18(12), 13-29.##
Kachergis, G., Kielstra, J., Bokkers, L., Persad, B., &Molenaar, I. (2018). Detecting reading strategies during task-oriented reading: Building an automated classifier. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Personalization Approaches in Learning Environments (PALE 2018).Kravcik, M., Santos, OC, Boticario, JG, Bielikova, M., Horvath, T. and Torre I.(Eds.). 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2018), CEUR workshop proceedings, this volume.##
Kairuz, T., Crump, K., & O'brein, A. (2007). Tools for data collection and analysis. The Pharmaceutical Journal, 278, 371–373.##
Karami, H. (2015). Exploratory factor analysis as a construct validation tool: Applications in applied linguistics research. TESOL Journal, 6(3), 476–498.##
Karasakaloglu, N. (2010). Prospective teachers' usage of reading strategies. European Journal of Social Sciences, 2(16), 221-230.##
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). London: Guilford Press.##
Kutluturk, S., &Yumru, H. (2017). Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Training to Enhance Freshmen’s Reading Skills. International Journal of Language and Literature, 5(1), 7-15.##
Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Sociocultural theory and second language learning: State of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 67-109.##
Lee, M. L. (2012). A Study of the Selection of Reading Strategies among Genders by EFL College Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64,310-319.##
Little, D. (2004). Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy and the European Language Portfolio.Usages delNouvelles Technologies dansl’Enseignement des languesEtràngeres: L’Autonomie de l’Enseignant et de l’Apprenant face aux Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication, 17-20.##
Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamenta